· Private foundation
Patterson Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $285k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $240k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRISTO REY ATLANTA JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL INC | $75,000 |
| TRINITY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC | $65,000 |
| RON CLARK ACADEMY INC | $50,000 |
| CITY OF REFUGE INC | $50,000 |
| CHASTAIN PARK CONSERVANCY | $40,000 |
| ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC | $30,000 |
| CREATE YOUR DREAMS INC | $30,000 |
| IGNATIUS HOUSE | $25,000 |
| RESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC | $25,000 |
| KIPP METRO ATLANTA COLLABORATIVE INC | $25,000 |
| WESTMINSTER SCHOOLS INC | $25,000 |
| THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND - GEORGIA OFFICE | $15,000 |
| ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION HCSR | $15,000 |
| HORIZONS ATLANTA INC | $15,000 |
| CAMP KUDZU INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RIREADSOURCE INC5× · 2017–2021 · $135k · revenue +95%
- DFDukes Foundation Coproration6× · 2017–2023 · $123k · revenue +123%
- BCBUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC6× · 2017–2022 · $114k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- AFATLANTA FULTON COUNTY ZOO INCone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -16%
- RVRAINBOW VILLAGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue +237%
- PGPTA GEORGIA CONGRESSone grant, 2017 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…
Spelman college, a historically black college and global leader in the education of women of african descent, is dedicated to the academic excellence of its students.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The mission of augusta health is to strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Southern Center for International Studies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRINITY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds READSOURCE INC ↗
- Who funds Dukes Foundation Coproration ↗
- Who funds BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds REACH FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds RON CLARK ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Chastain Park Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds Kipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc ↗
- Who funds Agape Community Center ↗
- Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds ODYSSEY INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
- Who funds Create Your Dreams Inc ↗
- Who funds Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA FULTON COUNTY ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP KUDZU INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
- Who funds KIDZ2LEADERS INC ↗
- Who funds BOBBY DODD INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
- Who funds RESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Georgia ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Workshop Players Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCY HOUSING SOUTHEAST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · The Goizueta Foundation Inc · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · The Catholic Foundation of North Georgia · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Zeist Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Patterson Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Naval Aviation Museum Foundation Inc — 13% of income from government
- Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Patterson Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Patterson Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.