Skip to content
Patrick & Susan Keefe Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Patrick & Susan Keefe Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$384k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$968kArts & Culture$429kHuman Services$323kReligion$271kHealth$96kInternational$86kHousing & Shelter$60kCrime & Legal$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Healthy Moms & Babies$80,000
University of Iowa$64,500
Friends of Batahola$55,000
CAPUCHIN FRANCISCAN CORPS$25,000
Catholic Charities of Philadelphia$15,000
SOME INC$15,000
St Agnes Outreach Services Day Room - Nurses Center$15,000
Catholic Relief Services$10,000
ANNIE'S HOME$10,000
Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY$10,000
Immaculate Heart of Mary Parish$7,000
Immaculate Heart of Mary Parish$7,000
Immaculate Heart of Mary Parish$5,750
TAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Annie's Home: $10k → 22%La Posada PROVIDENCIA: $5k → 23%DZI Foundation: $5k → 7%OneSource: $2k → 16%Alderson Hospitality House Land Trust Inc: $5k → 18%ANNIE'S HOME: $10k → 22%dZi FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%OneSource: $2k → 16%Annie's Home: $10k → 22%OneSource: $2k → 16%One Source: $1k → 16%Pregnancy Center Plus: $1k → 16%Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $10k → 16%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHWESTERN OHIO: $5k → 16%Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $3k → 16%Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $2k → 16%Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $2k → 16%CatholicCharities SouthwesternOhio: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 29 repeat orgs$619k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
40

Total granted

$1.8M
$549k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+10%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    Healthy Moms & Babes Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $216k · revenue +27%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR KABINGO INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $61k · revenue +30%
  • TT
    THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER
    4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA CENTER OF ADVANCEMENT
    one grant, 2019 · $210k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY
    one grant, 2020 · $110k
  • FI
    FORKIDS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
2
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
3
Catholic Charities Counseling & Adoption Services of the Diocese of Erie Inc

Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance

—
4
House of the Good Shepherd

House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…

Human Services
5
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
6
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
7
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
8
Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services

To deliver legal and social services to people and families who want to put down roots in the u.s. and cultivate welcoming communities that uphold our collective freedoms.

Civil Rights
9
The Women's Clinic of Columbus

Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.

Health
10
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
11
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
12
The Center for Women and Families Inc

To help victims of intimate partner abuse or sexual violence become survivors through supportive services, community education and cooperative partnerships that foster hope, promote self-sufficiency and rebuild lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Beyond Borders; the most unlike its peers is United Mission to Africa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/39
Grantees still filing
24/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Iowa: $565,000 · OtherUniversity of IowaFRIENDS OF BATAHOLA: $428,600 · OtherFRIENDS OF BATAHOLAUNIVERSITY OF IOWA CENTER OF ADVANCEMENT: $209,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA CENTER OF ADVANCEMENTUNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $109,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF PHARMACYImmaculate Heart of Mary Parish: $84,910 · Other+55 more: $611,385 · Other+55 moreHealthy Moms & Babes Inc: $216,000 · HealthHealthy Mo…+2 more: $2,000 · HealthANNIE'S HOME: $30,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $22,500 · Human ServicesDZI FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Resource Center Inc: $5,500 · Human ServicesLa Posada Providencia: $5,000 · Human ServicesALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE LAND TRU: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesPROVIDENCE CENTER: $20,000 · EducationWomens Justice Initiative Inc: $17,500 · EducationAMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationBOYS HOME INC: $2,500 · EducationTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $30,000 · Civil RightsINTERCOMMUNITY JUSTICE & PEACE CENT ER: $4,250 · Civil Rights+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsFABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $14,040 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DEMOCRACY CENTER: $10,000 · InternationalTEACHING FOR CHANGE: $2,500 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalFORKIDS INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,008,895Health$218,000Human Services$79,000Education$42,500Civil Rights$35,250International$27,040Housing & Shelter$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHealthy Moms & Babes Inc: $216,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetHOPE FOR KABINGO INC: $60,800 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetSOME INC: $42,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANNIE'S HOME: $30,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCapuchin Franciscan Volunteer Corps: $28,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetCatholic Charities Southwestern Ohio: $22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFORKIDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWomens Justice Initiative Inc: $17,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $14,040 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetESPERANZA LATINO CENTER OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY INC: $12,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DEMOCRACY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetDZI FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDC RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Resource Center Inc: $5,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLa Posada Providencia: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALDERSON HOSPITALITY HOUSE LAND TRU: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCatholic Social Services: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOMMUNITY JUSTICE & PEACE CENT ER: $4,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS HOME INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEACHING FOR CHANGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetESF DREAM CAMP FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWAUKESHA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSun City Vistoso Community Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOHIO JUSTICE AND POLICY CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY BEYOND BORDERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFound House-Interfaith Housing Network: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP TWIN LAKES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Healthy Moms & Babes Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR KABINGO INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNIE'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Capuchin Franciscan Volunteer Corps ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Womens Justice Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds FABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA LATINO CENTER OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DEMOCRACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DC RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnat…Ge Aerospace Foundati…United Way of Greater…Cpps Heritage Mission…Carol Ann and Ralph V…Johnson Charitable Gi…Bob & Felicia Burger …Williams FoundationRuth J & Robert a Con…Raskob Foundation for…The Scripps Howard Fo…Duke Energy Foundation
The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH29.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Cpps Heritage Mission Fund · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Bob & Felicia Burger Family Foundation · Williams Foundation · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc · The Scripps Howard Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Patrick & Susan Keefe Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Patrick & Susan Keefe Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Little Sisters of the Poor Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Patrick & Susan Keefe Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home