Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Patricia J Ruegsegger Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,030
Median grant
8
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys and Girls Clubs of Dane County$5,052
Childrens Hospital Colorado Foundation$3,091
K9s for Warriors$2,000
St Mary's Food Bank$1,200
Pets for Patriots$1,050
Give Kids the World$1,045
The Salvation Army$1,030
The Road Home Dane County$1,030
Dogs to Dogtags$1,000
Green Beret Racing$1,000
Mission K9 Rescue$1,000
Jacob's Hope$1,000
Pets for Vets$1,000
The River Food Pantry$520
Marine Toys for Tots Foundation$516
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Road Home Dane County: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
CO
VA
AZ
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dogs Playing for Life Inc

Dogs playing for life is redefining the meaning and importance of quality of life for all sheltered dogs by improving their experience through playgroups and individualized training, resulting in urgent and responsible livesaving.

Animals
2
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
3
CAUSE4PAWS Pet Food Bank

Many seniors and veterans share their only meal of the day with their companion animals. we deliver pet food for these precious animals so they can remain at home or with their person and not have to be surrendered to shelters.

Animals
4
K9S for Warriors Research Institute Inc

Research and advocacy for veterans with post-traumatic stress and the prevention of veteran suicide.

5
Canines for Service Inc

CFS seeks to inspire veterans through life-changing canine partnerships.

Human Services
6
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
7
Kansas City Pet Project

Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.

Animals
8
Danbury Animal Welfare Society

Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…

Animals
9
Paws With a Cause

To transform lives and strengthen communities through partnerships with custom trained working dogs.

Human Services
10
Happy Paws Haven Co

Happy Paws Haven Co. is a foster based animal rescue agency that helps animals in need.

11
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
12
Warrior Dog Foundation

To serve the special operations community, families, and k-9 military dogs, as well as law enforcement and contract working dogs. when possible, these canines are placed in forever homes.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marine Toys for Tots Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jacobs Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
3/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC — $5,052 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DA…Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $3,091 · HealthChildren's Hospital C…JACOBS HOPE — $1,000 · HealthJACOBS HOPEK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $2,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INCPETS FOR PATRIOTS INC — $1,050 · AnimalsPETS FOR PATRIOTS IN…Mission K9 Rescue Inc — $1,000 · AnimalsMission K9 Rescue In…GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC — $1,045 · OtherGIVE KIDS THE WORLD I…The Salvation Army — $1,030 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyGREEN BERET RACING — $1,000 · OtherGREEN BERET RACINGMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $516 · OtherMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS …CANOPY CENTER INC — $515 · OtherCANOPY CENTER INCPets for Vets Inc — $1,000 · Public BenefitPets for V…Dogs to Dog Tags Inc — $1,000 · Public BenefitDogs to Do…ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $1,200 · Food & NutritionTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC — $520 · Food & NutritionTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC — $1,030 · Human Services
Youth Development$5,052Health$4,091Animals$4,050Other$4,106Public Benefit$2,000Food & Nutrition$1,720Human Services$1,030

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC — $5,052 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $3,091 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETS FOR PATRIOTS INC — $1,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC — $1,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission K9 Rescue Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACOBS HOPE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPets for Vets Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDogs to Dog Tags Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC — $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $516 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANOPY CENTER INC — $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Patricia J Ruegsegger Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph