· Private foundation
Past Exhalted Rulers Association of Newark Oh Lodge 391 Charity Fd
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of PAST EXHALTED RULERS ASSOCIATION OF NEWARK OH LODGE 391 CHARITY FD’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $4,600 |
| WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA | $3,400 |
| ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| OHIO ELKS ASSOC CEREBRAL PALSY FD | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $2,500 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $2,100 |
| KINGDOM PILLARS | $2,100 |
| FRIENDSHIP CLUB OF LICKING COUNTY | $1,000 |
| BUCKEYE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA | $1,000 |
| C-TEC | $900 |
| MARYANN TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPT | $600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| NEWARK SPORTS & EVENT CENTER | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WAWreaths Across America9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +125%
- ENELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +96%
- LCLicking County Family YMCA8× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESone grant, 2024 · $3k
- LCLICKING COUNTY AGING PARTNERSone grant, 2024 · $3k
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEWARK OHone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provid service to our veterans, their families and their communties.
The ohio troopers coalition was established to assist in promoting the image of troopers across the state of ohio. the coalition is the voice of the troopers, the benefactor of their families, and the supporter of their families during…
Support veterans and active duty military and their families, promote Americanism in the community.
The activities of the Department are based on its obligation to assist veterans. The Department support the initiation sponsorship and development of programs & services that enhance the lives of veterans active members of the military and…
Serves veterans by providing benefits, employment, and child welfare programs. also works to improve communities through service, athletics, and education.
Through partnership, guiding those in need to sustainable housing.
To operate a non-profit club for members. all of whom are veterans. 215 served.
To promote the ideals of the organization by providing support in local events, sponsoring local charitable organizations, and socialization of membership comprised of members of the armed forces.
Provide support and maintenance of the livingston county veterans memorial, to provide support and maintenance for courthouse scrolls of livingston county veterans who have served in armed forces of the united states, and to provide a…
Promotes and regulates sports for individuals under age 18 by organizing local competitions, promulgating rules, organizing officials, presenting seminars and otherwise encouraging the growth of sport
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Licking County Family Ymca and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Pillars. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Licking County Family YMCA ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM PILLARS ↗
- Who funds SAVE A WARRIOR INC ↗
- Who funds The Twentieth Century Club Foundation ↗
- Who funds LICKING COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds Lima Company Memorial Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Federal Foundation · Columbus Foundation · The Englefield Foundation · Licking County Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Newark Lodge No 499 Loyal Order of Moose · Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc · Park National Corporation Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Past Exhalted Rulers Association of Newark Oh Lodge 391 Charity Fd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Past Exhalted Rulers Association of Newark Oh Lodge 391 Charity Fd?
Find your warmest path to Past Exhalted Rulers Association of Newark Oh Lodge 391 Charity Fd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.