Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Newark Lodge No 499 Loyal Order of Moose

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity benevolence and charity.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Human Services$1.7MPhilanthropy$901kArts & Culture$838kAnimals$466kHealth$229kRecreation & Sports$127kYouth Development$71kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $388k
  • $250k+1 grant · $285k
$13,818
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ohio State Moose Association Museum Inc$284,669
Hope Valley$27,656
Newark Citizens Police Academy$27,656
Licking County Family YMCA$27,656
Athletics Baseball Assoc$27,656
Licking County Humane Society$24,706
Hospice of Central Ohio$19,156
Licking County Sheriff$13,818
The Turban Project$13,818
The Works$13,818
Americ s Freedom Lodge$13,818
Mound City Little League$13,818
Camp O Bannon$13,818
Licking County 4H Committee$13,818
Licking County Aging Program$13,818
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Licking County YMCA: $1.6M → 10%Licking County YMCA: $43k → 10%Licking County Family YMCA: $28k → 10%Buckeye Valley Family YMCA: $18k → 10%A Special Wish Foundation: $14k → 15%Woodlands Serving Central Ohio Inc: $14k → 10%The Woodlands: $14k → 10%The Woodlands: $9k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 18 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$2.8M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+49%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyMembership BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Licking County Family YMCA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +19%
  • OS
    OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $420k · revenue +268%
  • HV
    HOPE VALLEY - HELPING OTHERS THROUGH PERSONAL EXPERIENCES
    2× · 2023–2025 · $97k · revenue +131% · 49% of their budget

Funded once

  • MC
    MOOSE CHARITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $901k · revenue +49%
  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP CLUB OF LICKING COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $802k
  • NC
    NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Agriculteral Extension Camps Inc

4-h camp ohio is a year round resident camp specializing in youth education. the camp serves 13 counties of 4-h groups & 1 state leadership camp. school & outdoor ed groups are the mainstay of the business from march through may & sept…

Youth Development
2
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
3
Ohio District 5 Area Agency On Aging Inc

The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…

4
Long Term Care Ombudsman

As mandated by the federal older americans act and ohio law, the mission of the long term care ombudsman program is to seek the resolution of problems and advocate for the rights of the home care consumers and residents of long- term care…

5
Ashland Assisted Living Inc

To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…

Human Services
6
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio Delaware Housing Inc

See schedule oto create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home…

7
Association of Ohio Health Commissioners

The mission of aohc is to provide exceptional service to its members and to advance the mission of public health to prevent, promote and protect the health of the community by developing and maintaining strong local public health…

8
Ohio Life Sciences Association

Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.

Community Improvement
9
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

10
4-H Camp Clifton

Educational camping facility operated by seven county Ohio State University Extension offices. We provide overnight camping day camps swimming archery hiking teamwork activities outdoor education and overall life skills development for…

Recreation & Sports
11
Lutheran Outdoor Ministries in Ohio

To inspire people to embrace their callings in creation and community by connecting people with nature and faith.

12
United Way of Licking County Inc

Improving people's lives in licking county, ohio by raising, prioritizing, awarding and monitoring funds allocated to programs that demonstrate success in the areas of education, income, health, and basic needs.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health America of Licking County and the most unlike its peers is Americas Freedom Lodge Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyArts & Cultural Organizatio…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Senior Residential CareAffordable Housing ProvidersRegional Economic Developme…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%7%<5yr13%4%5–10yr17%22%10–20yr14%19%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr24%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr13%18%5–10yr17%12%10–20yr14%22%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr24%40%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
12%
1,266/10,322

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Licking County Family YMCA — $1,698,714 · Human ServicesLicking County Family YMCA+2 more — $50,130 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP CLUB OF LICKING COUNTY — $802,359 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CLUB OF LICKING COUNT…LICKING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES — $58,204 · OtherNEWARK CITIZEN POLICE ACADEMY — $50,150 · OtherATHLETIC BASEBALL ASSOCIATION — $49,150 · OtherLICKING COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $45,060 · Other+15 more — $289,012 · Other+15 moreMOOSE CHARITIES INC — $900,650 · PhilanthropyMOOSE CHARITIES INCOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC — $419,951 · Membership BenefitOHIO STATE…HOPE VALLEY - HELPING OTHERS THROUGH PERSONAL EXPERIENCES — $97,481 · HealthCAMP O BANNON OF LICKING COUNTY INC — $35,312 · Recreation & SportsMOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE INC — $35,012 · Recreation & SportsTHE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY — $35,312 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$1,748,844Other$1,293,935Philanthropy$900,650Membership Benefit$419,951Health$97,481Recreation & Sports$70,324Food & Nutrition$35,312

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLicking County Family YMCA — $1,698,714 over 4y, 19% of budgetMOOSE CHARITIES INC — $900,650 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC — $419,951 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetHOPE VALLEY - HELPING OTHERS THROUGH PERSONAL EXPERIENCES — $97,481 over 2y, 49% of budgetLICKING COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $45,060 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF CENTRAL OHIO — $39,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT — $36,312 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTHE WOODLANDS SERVING CENTRAL OHIO INC — $36,312 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP O BANNON OF LICKING COUNTY INC — $35,312 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LICKING COUNTY — $35,312 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY — $35,312 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE INC — $35,012 over 3y, 11% of budgetAMERICAS FREEDOM LODGE CORP — $22,932 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC — $22,932 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON KENTON COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $22,932 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LICKING & PERRY COUNTIES INC — $12,468 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOC — $5,850 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSION — $5,786 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Licking County Foundation IncOH38.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Licking County Foundation Inc · Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc · First Federal Foundation · The Lindorf Family Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · United Way of Licking County Inc · The John and Mary Alford Foundation · Licking Memorial Health Foundation · The Englefield Foundation · Cecil Mauger Charitable Trust · Columbus Foundation · The Patricia R and Herbert J Murphy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Newark Lodge No 499 Loyal Order of Moose funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Newark Lodge No 499 Loyal Order of Moose?

    Find your warmest path to Newark Lodge No 499 Loyal Order of Moose through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph