How much does Partners in Action Inc give?

Partners in Action Inc reported 11 itemized grants totaling $535,456, out of $729,219 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Partners in Action Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are International (46%), Human Services (14%), Religion (14%).

Who are Partners in Action Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Partners in Action Inc Rocky Point Medical Clinics LLC ($618k), Capri Landing Holdings LLC ($396k), Friends of Bukwo Global ($253k).

Does Partners in Action Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 73% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Partners in Action Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.

Where is Partners in Action Inc based?

Partners in Action Inc is based in AZ.

Partners in Action Inc

Partners in Action Inc at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Partners in Action Inc

Partners in action creates social impact by empowering, supporting, and serving sustainable humanitarian projects and charitable organizations and activities that primarily focus on improving the lives of individuals in underserved communities around the world, while sharing the gospel of jesus christ with those we come into contact with.

$729k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$88k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.6MHuman Services$507kReligion$495kHealth$484kHousing & Shelter$252kYouth Development$82kEducation$57kPublic Safety & Disaster$15k

02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 11 grants below total $535,456, the rows itemized in this filing. The $729,219 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $193,763 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $6k
$10k–50k5 grants · $128k
$50k–250k5 grants · $401k

$42,045

Median grant

States reached

$747k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
ROCKY POINT MEDICAL CLINIC	$87,500
LUKE 4 18 MINISTRY	$84,982
KINGDOMWORKS PROJECT	$81,353
FRIENDS OF BUKWO GLOBAL	$77,300
WORDS OF HOPE MINISTRY	$69,791
THE DUNAMIS INITIATIVE	$42,045
BRIDGES FOR PEACE	$30,600
DIRECTION INSTRUCTION & GUIDANCE	$24,634
ARIZONA STATE CHAPLAIN SERVICE	$19,174
INHERITANCE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES	$12,000
VULN 837	$6,077

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

Grants abroad, by region: $194k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$170k · 88% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE/CHARITABLE · EDUCATING CHILDREN ON CONSERVATION · SCHOOL/CHURCH/CHARITABLE

North America (Canada and Mexico)$23k · 12% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE/CHARITABLE · ORPHANGE/CHARITABLE

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$3.3M · 25 repeat orgs$279k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.3M

$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%

+5%

Still filing today

32%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterReligionHealthInternationalHuman ServicesOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PI
PARTNERS IN ACTION INC ROCKY POINT MEDICAL CLINICS LLC
6× · 2017–2022 · $618k · revenue +121% · 99% of their budget
CL
CAPRI LANDING HOLDINGS LLC
6× · 2017–2022 · $396k · revenue +13% · 100% of their budget
WO
WORDS OF HOPE MINISTRY
3× · 2022–2024 · $224k · revenue +29% · 92% of their budget

Funded once

PI
PARTNERS IN ACTION INC
one grant, 2022 · $57k
PL
PALOMINO LINK
one grant, 2017 · $49k
PA
PARACLETE AZ
one grant, 2022 · $32k · revenue +11%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yucatan Outreach Ministries

Starting and maintaining missions/churches in Mexico

Religion

El Paso for Jesus

Christian Ministry - spreading the word of Jesus

—

Mission Acts Ministries

Work with churches in usa mex

Unclassified

Mexico Orphan Missions Inc

International

Palabra De Esperanza

Bring word of hope to the lost, for a ne

Community Improvement

Held By Him

Christian ministry work

Unclassified

Life Freedom Ministries

Contributions of money andsupplies to orphanages in africa, mexico, nepal, and india

Religion

Outreach Unlimited Ministries

Ministry aid to needy in central americ

—

Hour of Hope Haiti Ministry

Christian evangelism / discipleship and orphan care

Religion

Hope Without Boundaries

Charity work in Tijuana, Mexico

International

Zoya Ministries Inc

Religion

Guillermo Villanueva Ministries

To preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the ends of the earth

Religion

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Words of Hope Ministry; the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Resource Center of Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/16

Grantees still filing

9/16

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$2,588,282Housing & Shelter$559,430Religion$215,508Health$150,627International$12,000Human Services$11,085

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA4.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partners in Action Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partners in Action Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Partners in Action’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home