· Public charity
Partners in Action Inc
Partners in action creates social impact by empowering, supporting, and serving sustainable humanitarian projects and charitable organizations and activities that primarily focus on improving the lives of individuals in underserved communities around the world, while sharing the gospel of jesus christ with those we come into contact with.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $535,456 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $729,219 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $193,763 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $128k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $401k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROCKY POINT MEDICAL CLINIC | $87,500 |
| LUKE 4 18 MINISTRY | $84,982 |
| KINGDOMWORKS PROJECT | $81,353 |
| FRIENDS OF BUKWO GLOBAL | $77,300 |
| WORDS OF HOPE MINISTRY | $69,791 |
| THE DUNAMIS INITIATIVE | $42,045 |
| BRIDGES FOR PEACE | $30,600 |
| DIRECTION INSTRUCTION & GUIDANCE | $24,634 |
| ARIZONA STATE CHAPLAIN SERVICE | $19,174 |
| INHERITANCE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES | $12,000 |
| VULN 837 | $6,077 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $194k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE/CHARITABLE · EDUCATING CHILDREN ON CONSERVATION · SCHOOL/CHURCH/CHARITABLE
Stated purpose: ORPHANAGE/CHARITABLE · ORPHANGE/CHARITABLE
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PIPARTNERS IN ACTION INC ROCKY POINT MEDICAL CLINICS LLC6× · 2017–2022 · $618k · revenue +121% · 99% of their budget
- CLCAPRI LANDING HOLDINGS LLC6× · 2017–2022 · $396k · revenue +13% · 100% of their budget
- POPARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES3× · 2017–2019 · $151k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- PIPARTNERS IN ACTION INCone grant, 2022 · $57k
- PLPALOMINO LINKone grant, 2017 · $49k
- PAPARACLETE AZone grant, 2022 · $32k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Starting and maintaining missions/churches in Mexico
Christian Ministry - spreading the word of Jesus
Work with churches in usa mex
Bring word of hope to the lost, for a ne
Christian ministry work
Contributions of money andsupplies to orphanages in africa, mexico, nepal, and india
Ministry aid to needy in central americ
Christian evangelism / discipleship and orphan care
Charity work in Tijuana, Mexico
To preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the ends of the earth
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Words of Hope Ministry and the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Resource Center of Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARTNERS IN ACTION INC ROCKY POINT MEDICAL CLINICS LLC ↗
- Who funds CAPRI LANDING HOLDINGS LLC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BUKWO GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds WORDS OF HOPE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ROCKY POINT MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PARENTS OF ADDICTED LOVED ONES ↗
- Who funds DEEPER WATER MINISTRIES LTD ↗
- Who funds KINGDOMWORKS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds LUKE 4 18 MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds TITUS FOUNDATION MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds ETERNITY CHANGERS ↗
- Who funds PARACLETE AZ ↗
- Who funds HELP US MOVE IN INC ↗
- Who funds Challenge Ministries US ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND CARE OUTREACH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Partners in Action Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.