Skip to content

· Private foundation

Park Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$216k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$457k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$3,000
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
ZANE STATE COLLEGE$2,000
OHIO UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166k · 25 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +5% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
39

Total granted

$166k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-1%

Still filing today

12%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OU
    OHIO UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $34k
  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $14k
  • HC
    HOCKING COLLEGE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $11k

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
4
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
5
Union Institute & University

Union Institute & University educates highly motivated adults who seek academic programs to engage, enlighten, and empower them to pursue professional goals and a lifetime of learning and service. Offering accredited bachelors, masters,…

—
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
8
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
9
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
10
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskingum University; the most unlike its peers is Columbus College of Art & Design. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO UNIVERSITY: $34,150 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,183 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYHOCKING COLLEGE: $11,000 · OtherHOCKING COLLEGEBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,941 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITYZANE STATE COLLEGE: $8,200 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $6,600 · OtherSHAWNEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,500 · Other+48 more: $86,500 · Other+48 moreOtterbein University: $10,500 · EducationOtterbein Universit…MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $9,391 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIVERSIT…MALONE UNIVERSITY: $8,800 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Mount Union: $4,000 · EducationUniversity of Mount…OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationWAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · Education+3 more: $2,200 · Education+3 more
Other$178,074Education$37,891

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOtterbein University: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $9,391 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $8,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Otterbein University ↗
  • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WAYNESBURG UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS COLLEGE OF ART & DESIGN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Berry Marie D Fd H Pfdn · Ruth M Hughes Scholarship Trust · Community Foundations Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Park Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Park Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Park’s filings →

    More from the funding graph