Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

Park Cities Quail Inc

Award grants to organizations that promote research and youth leadership development program focused on wildlife and promotes the hunting heritage.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$81,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$680,125
Organizations funded a year
6 to 12
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$2.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Park Cities Quail Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
AnimalsCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$1.2M38%
FY20236$974k0%
FY202211$1.4M45%
FY20217$1.3M14%
FY202012$1.0M25%
FY201911$1.2Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$4.4MScience & Tech$1.3MEnvironment$1.0MEducation$150kHuman Services$136kYouth Development$41kPublic Benefit$33kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rolling Plains Quail Research Foundation$3,372,592554%
Texas Tech Foundation Inc$1,020,00051%
Rollings Plains Quail Researc$680,1251n/a
Tall Timbers Research Inc$475,81361%
Borderlands Research Institute$230,0003n/a
Texas Tech University System$200,0003n/a
Dallas Ecological Foundation$195,00065%
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc$195,00021%
Borderlands Research Foundation$167,00037%
Bobwhite Brigade$162,300519%
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of Park Cities Quail Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rolling Plains Quail Research Foundation$3,372,592554%
Texas Tech Foundation Inc$1,020,00051%
Rollings Plains Quail Researc$680,1251n/a
Tall Timbers Research Inc$475,81361%
Borderlands Research Institute$230,0003n/a
Texas Tech University System$200,0003n/a
Dallas Ecological Foundation$195,00065%
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc$195,00021%
Borderlands Research Foundation$167,00037%
Bobwhite Brigade$162,300519%
National Bobwhite and Grassland Initiative Foundation$81,00017%
Trinity Oaks Enterprises$66,40014%
Helicopters for Heroes$57,00027%
Higgins Branchini Shooting Foundation$40,500423%
South Dakota Upland Outfitters Association$25,00013%
Quail Federation Inc$25,0001n/a
Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc$20,00010%
Quailguard LLC$19,3381n/a
Combat Marine Outdoors Inc$17,90011%
Western Navarro Bobwhite Recovery Initiative$15,0001n/a
Texas Brigades$15,0001n/a
Heroes on the Water Inc$12,10011%
University of North Texas$8,0001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Park Cities Quail Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 15 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRolling Plains Quail Research Foundation: $3,372,592 over 5y, 54% of budgetTexas Tech Foundation Inc: $1,020,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTall Timbers Research Inc: $475,813 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetDallas Ecological Foundation: $195,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetTheodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc: $195,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBorderlands Research Foundation: $167,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetBobwhite Brigade: $162,300 over 5y, 19% of budgetNational Bobwhite and Grassland Initiative Foundation: $81,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetTrinity Oaks Enterprises: $66,400 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetHelicopters for Heroes: $57,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetHiggins Branchini Shooting Foundation: $40,500 over 4y, 23% of budgetSouth Dakota Upland Outfitters Association: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetProject Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCombat Marine Outdoors Inc: $17,900 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHeroes on the Water Inc: $12,100 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 15.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Park Cities Quail Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Park Cities Quail Inc?

Find your warmest path to Park Cities Quail Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Park Cities Quail Inc

How much does Park Cities Quail Inc give?
Park Cities Quail Inc reported 8 grants totaling $1,153,459 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 12 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does Park Cities Quail Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (61%), Science & Tech (18%), Environment (14%).
Who are Park Cities Quail Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Rolling Plains Quail Research Foundation ($3.4M), Texas Tech Foundation Inc ($1.0M), Rollings Plains Quail Researc ($680k).
Does Park Cities Quail Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Park Cities Quail Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Quail Federation Inc Dba Greater Houston Quail Coalition Inc, Greater Houston Community Foundation, American Endowment Foundation.
Where is Park Cities Quail Inc based?
Park Cities Quail Inc is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.2M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Park Cities Quail’s filings →

More from the funding graph