Skip to content
Parcesepe Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Parcesepe Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$93kHealth$79kEducation$10kHuman Services$5kPhilanthropy$5kHousing & Shelter$5kReligion$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$654k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALVARY HOSPITAL$10,000
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE$10,000
ANIMAL WELFAE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY$5,000
DELTA RESCUE$5,000
JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH CENTER$5,000
PAWS 4 EVER$2,500
BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION$2,500
LITTLE ORPHAN ANIMALS$2,000
SPCA OF WESTCHESTER$2,000
FORGOTTEN FELINES$2,000
CARE$1,000
KATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CT
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 14 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$228k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+18%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +10%
  • CH
    CALVARY HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $19k · revenue +2%
  • JG
    JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $19k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT COgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +49%
  • WB
    WOMEN'S BIRTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -93%
  • OS
    OUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pet Animal Welfare Society of Connecticut Inc

Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…

Animals
2
All About Animals Rescue

All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.

Animals
3
Friends for Animal Rescue Ny Inc

Friends for animal rescue ny, inc. is a nonprofit organization that furthers the interest of animals in the new york state area and improves their quality of life by supporting medical care, enrichment activities, training and…

Animals
4
Animal Rescue Force Inc

Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.

Animals
5
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
6
Little Shelter Animal Adoption Center Inc

Little shelter animal adoption center, one of long island's oldest no-kill shelters,is dedicated to saving all companion animals whose lives are in jeopardy. throughrescue from kill facilities, rehabilitation of sick and un-socialized…

Animals
7
Love and Hope Animal Sanctuary Inc

The sanctuary's mission is to provide permanent care, including shelter, food, vetrinary care and medicine for all of our animals, all of whom are not adoptable, in our cage free, no-kill shelter. the sanctuary also operates a low cost…

Animals
8
Animal Welfare Society of Jefferson County

The organization provides health and welfare care for abandoned animals through its no-kill animal shelter to homeless puppies, kittens, dogs and cats as well as spay-neuter, inoculation, and adoption services.

Animals
9
Animal Rescue Project

Animal rescue project saves homeless pets, one at a time, and offers socially responsible adoption services to those seeking the companionship of pets. by providing medical care to homeless pets, providing temporary shelter to them, and…

Animals
10
The Animal Rights Alliance Inc

Our mission is to help put an end to pet overpopulation and to help end the needless suffering of animals.

—
11
Bideawee Inc

To be greater new york's leader in rescuing, caring for, and place homeless cats and dogs.

Animals
12
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Forgotten Felines Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jimmy Martello Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $26,000 · AnimalsDedication and Everlasting Love to AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC: $20,000 · AnimalsANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INCJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $19,000 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATIO…ANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $18,500 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTYFORGOTTEN FELINES INC: $12,000 · AnimalsFORGOTTEN FELINES INCLITTLE ORPHAN ANIMALS INC: $12,000 · AnimalsLITTLE ORPHAN ANIMALS INCSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $11,500 · AnimalsSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC+1 more: $2,000 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH CENTER: $40,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH CENTE…JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER: $15,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL RESEARCH CE…KATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY: $10,556 · OtherKATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARYOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherOUR SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCHBUILDING HAVEN NW ORGANIZATION: $5,000 · OtherBUILDING HAVEN NW ORGANIZATION+2 more: $1,000 · OtherBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthBOOMER ESIASON FOUND…CALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 · HealthCALVARY HOSPITAL INCWOMEN'S BIRTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthWOMEN'S BIRTH AND WE…+2 more: $2,000 · HealthALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT CO: $5,000 · Human ServicesJimmy Martello Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $2,000 · InternationalSomers Volunteer Fire Departmen Inc: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Animals$121,000Other$76,556Health$46,000Human Services$5,000Philanthropy$5,000International$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $26,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY: $18,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFORGOTTEN FELINES INC: $12,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetLITTLE ORPHAN ANIMALS INC: $12,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $11,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY: $10,556 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetALLAIRE COMMUNITY FARM A NJ NONPROFIT CO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S BIRTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJimmy Martello Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJERSEY SHORE ANIMAL CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSomers Volunteer Fire Departmen Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY12.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Parcesepe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Parcesepe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parcesepe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home