Skip to content

· Public charity

Paperseed Foundation Inc

To provide grants to help education-focused organizations become self-sustaining.

$1k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Civil Rights$129kInternational$77kEducation$69kYouth Development$66kEnvironment$50kFood & Nutrition$43kCommunity Improvement$25kScience & Tech$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAMASTE DIRECT$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($415k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($96k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ZANAAFRICA FOUNDATION: $24k → 14%ZANAAFRICA FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $30k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $13k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC

Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($96k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Malta$29k · 2 grants
India$24k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$17k · 1 grant
Kenya$13k · 1 grant
China$13k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Paperseed Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 18%.

Paperseed Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 29% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$393k · 12 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$393k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+89%

Still filing today

58%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23
InternationalArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $129k · revenue +612%
  • FI
    FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $43k · revenue +57%
  • TK
    THE KILGORIS PROJECT
    2× · 2018–2020 · $42k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • MF
    MILAAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $24k
  • CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +89%
  • VV
    VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gvi Foundation

Gvi foundation aims to deliver global experiences promoting sustainable development, conservation, education and the development of purposeful careers for the common good. our mission is positively aligned with the united nations…

International
2
Together Women Rise

Together women rise champions gender equality because womens rights are human rights. when women and girls are treated equally, the world is healthier, safer, more peaceful, inclusive, and economically just for everyone.

Philanthropy
3
Africa Agility

Our mission is to equip underserved youthespecially women and girls with future-ready skills in technology Agile methodologies and entrepreneurship empowering them to access dignified work drive innovation and compete globally.

Education
4
Global Glow
Youth Development
5
The Malala Fund

We work to ensure all girls can access and complete 12 years of education. by completing 12 years of quality schooling, girls will have the knowledge, skills and confidence they need to reach their full potential, make their own life…

Education
6
Getaway Growth

As our world becomes increasingly interconnected and we experience an era of unprecedented world challenges, underserved communities need help overcoming steep barriers to enriching learning opportunities such as international educational…

Youth Development
7
Abundant Village

Abundant village works at the intersection of social impact and conservation, with a primary focus on regenerating under-resourced communities living in or adjacent to critical biodiversity areas. abundant village co-creates community-led…

Human Services
8
Girls in Stem
Human Services
9
Ceda International

To strengthen young women's civic participation and leadership

—
10
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
11
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
12
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives

GAIAs mission is to strengthen grassroots social movements that advance solutions to waste and pollution, working towards a just, zero waste world where people are free from toxic pollution.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Rising; the most unlike its peers is Keep California Beautiful Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOPIN: $29,074 · OtherKOPINIndividual grant recipient: $26,894 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMILAAN FOUNDATION: $23,595 · OtherMILAAN FOUNDATIONSHAMBALA FOUNDATION: $17,540 · OtherSHAMBALA FOUNDATIONEDUCATION FOR ALL: $17,112 · OtherEDUCATION FOR ALLIndividual grant recipient: $16,242 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMAIA IMPACT SCHOOL: $15,749 · OtherMAIA IMPACT SCHOOLNAMASTE FOUNDATION: $6,250 · Other+10 more: $5,250 · OtherCREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC: $128,612 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC+1 more: $3,700 · Arts & CultureFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesFILLING IN THE BL…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZANAAFRICA CORP: $35,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS …THE KILGORIS PROJECT: $42,294 · InternationalTHE KILGORIS PRO…CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · InternationalCAPE ELEUTHERA F…Girl Rising: $13,700 · InternationalGirl RisingKeep California Beautiful Inc: $30,000 · EnvironmentKeep Califo…VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION: $20,000 · EnvironmentVIDA VERDE …GROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC: $18,349 · Community Improvement
Other$157,706Arts & Culture$132,312Human Services$77,500International$75,994Environment$50,000Community Improvement$18,349

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC: $128,612 over 4y, 12% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC: $42,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE KILGORIS PROJECT: $42,294 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZANAAFRICA CORP: $35,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKeep California Beautiful Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC: $18,349 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetGirl Rising: $13,700 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNAMASTE FOUNDATION: $6,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetYouth in Arts: $3,700 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FILLING IN THE BLANKS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KILGORIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZANAAFRICA CORP ↗
  • Who funds Keep California Beautiful Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VIDA VERDE NATURE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORK BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Rising ↗
  • Who funds NAMASTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Youth in Arts ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paperseed Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paperseed Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Groundwork Bridgeport Inc: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paperseed Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Paperseed Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paperseed’s filings →

More from the funding graph