Skip to content

· Private foundation

Panda Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$104kHealth$56kHuman Services$30kEducation$26kPhilanthropy$21kArts & Culture$17kHousing & Shelter$7kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION$20,000
FAMILY FORWARD$3,000
PARAQUAD$2,000
ALMOST HOME$2,000
DIRECT RELIEF$2,000
FRIZZY BY NATURE$2,000
MEDS & FOOD FOR KIDS$2,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR AAIR$1,500
CITY ACADEMY$1,000
READY READERS$1,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY AND CULTURE$1,000
ARTS FOR LIFE$1,000
CHILD MIND INSTITUTE$1,000
ST LOUIS AREA FOODBANK$1,000
PARENTS AS TEACHERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $2k → 16%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $1k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $1k → 16%CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $1k → 14%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $1k → 16%CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $1k → 16%FAMILY FORWARD: $3k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $2k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $2k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $2k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $2k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $1k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $1k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $1k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $500 → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $500 → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
CT
CA
MO
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$215k · 33 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
22

Total granted

$215k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+16%

Still filing today

73%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
    8× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +2%
  • RR
    READY READERS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +156%
  • PA
    PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -20%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • SI
    SSP INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +475%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
5
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
The Louisville Urban League Inc

As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.

Human Services
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Activity Center; the most unlike its peers is Fly North Theatricals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
24/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION: $90,000 · OtherI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATIONBETTER FAMILY LIFE CULTURAL EDUCATIONAL AND BUSINESS CENTER: $7,000 · OtherASTHMA & ALLERGY FOUNDATION: $6,800 · OtherCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $6,500 · Other+32 more: $53,550 · Other+32 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTON U…READY READERS: $8,000 · EducationREADY READER…SSP INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · EducationSSP INTERNAT…CHARACTERPLUS: $4,100 · EducationCHARACTERPLU…+4 more: $3,200 · Education+4 moreCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $12,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S …CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN A…CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $4,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO FUR…ST LOUIS ARC INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $8,000 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $500 · Youth DevelopmentSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $2,000 · Arts & CultureNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureLorraine Civil Rights Museum Foundation: $1,500 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $1,250 · Arts & CultureTESSERACT THEATRE COMPANY: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$163,850Education$30,300Human Services$27,750Philanthropy$16,500Health$15,500Youth Development$10,500Arts & Culture$9,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $12,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER: $10,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetREADY READERS: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARAQUAD INC: $5,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSSP INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $5,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHARACTERPLUS: $4,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAlmost Home: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO FURNITURE BANK: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S CHOIRS: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDS & FOOD FOR KIDS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRoom at the Inn: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLorraine Civil Rights Museum Foundation: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLY NORTH THEATRICALS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SOLIDARITY FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRanken Technical College: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GENESEE COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTESSERACT THEATRE COMPANY: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN ACTIVITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING & SPEECH ↗
  • Who funds PARAQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SSP INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARACTERPLUS ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO FURNITURE BANK ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S CHOIRS ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDS & FOOD FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds NEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Room at the Inn ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lorraine Civil Rights Museum Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FLY NORTH THEATRICALS ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO32.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Pott Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · St Louis Community Foundation · Berges Family Foundation · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · Edward Jones Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Panda Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Panda Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Panda Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Panda Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Panda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph