Skip to content

· Private foundation

Palmer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$350k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$573kHuman Services$473kEducation$450kYouth Development$166kArts & Culture$80kHealth$79kEnvironment$75kReligion$73kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW BRAUFELS FOOD BANK$70,000
ST JOHN'S SCHOOL$45,000
DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER$35,000
CASA DE ESPERANZA$35,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$30,000
KID'S MEALS$25,000
INTERFAITH MINISTRIES HOUSTON$20,000
MAGELLAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$15,000
GIRLS SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN TEXAS$15,000
ALAMO AREA BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$15,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY KINGSVILLE FOU$10,000
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON$10,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$7,500
NEW BRAUNFELS PARKS FOUNDATION$5,000
THE HOUSTON ZOO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $388k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DNA DOE PROJECT: $3k → 9%THE NEHEMIAH CENTER: $10k → 16%DNA Doe Project: $3k → 9%DNA Doe Project: $3k → 9%DNA Doe Project: $3k → 9%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%HOUSTON AREA WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $35k → 16%DePelchin Children's Center: $35k → 16%DePelchin Childrens Center: $35k → 16%DePelchin Children's Center: $30k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $12k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $12k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 16%Kid's Meals: $35k → 16%Kids Meals: $35k → 16%Kid's Meals: $30k → 16%KID'S MEALS: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 34 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
7

Total granted

$2.0M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+33%

Still filing today

56%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $273k · revenue +46%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $170k · revenue +56%
  • DC
    DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $169k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • CI
    COMP-U-DOPT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +286%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +78%
  • NC
    Nehemiah Center Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
2
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
3
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
5
John P McGovern Museum of Health & Medical Science

The Health Museum is an innovative science center that provides an interactive and entertaining experience for all ages, promotes understanding and appreciation of the human body, mind, and spirit, and inspires a lifelong commitment to…

Arts & Culture
6
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
7
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
8
Hill Country Montessori School Inc

Provide quality education for students from pre school through middle school using the Montessori method of learning and teaching.

Education
9
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

—
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
11
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center; the most unlike its peers is New Braunfels Parks Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $273,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCSt John's School: $155,000 · OtherSt John's SchoolCASA DE ESPERANZA: $110,000 · OtherCASA DE ESPERANZACASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC: $99,500 · OtherCASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INCInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $73,000 · OtherNEW BRAUFELS FOOD BANK: $70,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC: $67,000 · OtherKIDS MEALS HOUSTON: $60,000 · Other+20 more: $388,000 · Other+20 moreDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $168,500 · Human ServicesDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S…KIDS' MEALS INC: $124,500 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS INCHouston Area Women's Center: $75,000 · Human ServicesHouston Area Women's…+2 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesHouston Museum of Natural Science: $60,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $40,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · EnvironmentTHE MAGELLAN SCHOOL: $35,000 · EducationTRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $15,000 · EducationHouston Zoo Inc: $35,000 · AnimalsBOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $27,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $12,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthNew Braunfels Parks Foundation: $14,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,465,500Human Services$388,000Arts & Culture$100,000Environment$75,000Education$65,000Animals$40,000Health$40,000Recreation & Sports$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $273,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $170,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $168,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSt John's School: $155,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $124,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC: $99,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetHouston Area Women's Center: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Ministries for Greater Houston: $73,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC: $67,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHouston Museum of Natural Science: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL: $39,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MAGELLAN SCHOOL: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMP-U-DOPT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew Braunfels Parks Foundation: $14,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNehemiah Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDNA DOE PROJECT: $10,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGULF COAST REGIONAL BLOOD CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds St John's School ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Ministries for Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Houston Museum of Natural Science ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE MAGELLAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Houston Zoo Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds TRINIDAD STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMP-U-DOPT INC ↗
  • Who funds New Braunfels Parks Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FALFURRIAS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds Nehemiah Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds DNA DOE PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Palmer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Palmer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Palmer’s filings →

More from the funding graph