Skip to content
Pagliarulo Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Pagliarulo Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$196k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$697kCommunity Improvement$76kHuman Services$61kArts & Culture$55kFood & Nutrition$54kHousing & Shelter$50kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$75,866
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$25,000
CREATIVE GROWTH GROUP INC$25,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$25,000
HOPEWILL FOUNDATION INC$23,175
THE FIRST TEE OF TAMPA BAY$20,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER$1,800
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$15
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50k → 13%THE FIRST TEE OF TAMPA BAY: $26k → 13%THE FIRST TEE OF TAMPA BAY: $20k → 13%THE FIRST TEE OF TAMPA BAY: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$883k · 9 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$883k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+18%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $422k · revenue ×23
  • HF
    HOPEWILL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $79k · revenue +186%
  • TM
    TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $61k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +18%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA GRANT
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • AR
    ANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health
12
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tampa General Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $422,009 · HealthTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $105,515 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCHOPEWILL FOUNDATION INC: $78,766 · HealthHOPEWILL FOUNDATION INCMARY LEES HOUSE INC: $24,267 · Health+1 more: $6,800 · HealthCREATIVE GROWTH GROUP INC: $76,250 · OtherCREATIVE GROWTH GROUP…OLD FLORIDA FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherOLD FLORIDA FOUNDATIO…BLOOD CANCER UNITED: $25,000 · OtherBLOOD CANCER UNITEDUNIVERSITY OF TAMPA GRANT: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TAMPA G…ST MARY CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherTAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $60,600 · Human ServicesTAMPA METROP…METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN…GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $54,250 · Food & NutritionANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Health$637,357Other$191,250Human Services$110,600Food & Nutrition$54,250Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $422,009 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $105,515 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWILL FOUNDATION INC: $78,766 over 3y, 10% of budgetTAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC: $60,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $54,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARY LEES HOUSE INC: $24,267 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $6,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncNatl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Baird Foundation IncWI12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pagliarulo Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pagliarulo Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Tampa Metropolitan Area Young Men's Christian Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pagliarulo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home