Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Page Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$124kReligion$75kYouth Development$61kCivil Rights$60kHuman Services$52kArts & Culture$36kHealth$16kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$582k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FILAMCCO$9,493
American Chinese Association$9,280
Council of Asian Pacific Americans$7,420
Michigan Asian Youth Education Foundation$7,003
Midwest Buddhist Meditation Center$5,400
Detroit Chinese Engineers Association$3,000
Duke University$1,500
Korean American Cultural Center of Michigan$1,000
Wounded Warrior Project$1,000
St Jude Children's Hospital$1,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$750
Michigan Humane Society$500
Disabled American Veterans$500
ASPCA$500
American Cancer Society$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Tom Kowalski Foundation: $800 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
CA
KY
MD
KS
NC
DC
MS
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$426k · 30 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
27

Total granted

$426k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+47%

Still filing today

30%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    3× · 2018–2021 · $75k · revenue +28%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +41%
  • KA
    KOREAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER OF MICHIGAN
    2× · 2018–2025 · $2k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • MH
    MATRIX HUMAN SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $47k · revenue +47%
  • AP
    Ascension Providence
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • HF
    Henry Ford Cancer Institute
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

2
Detroit Athletic Club

To create life-enriching experiences that build meaningful relations, foster personal and professional growth, and celebrate culture in the heart of detroit.

3
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

4
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

5
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
6
Detroit Police Athletic League Incorporated

Detroit pal, working in partnership with the police department and community volunteers, has the mission to help youth find their greatness through athletic programs and youth enrichment opportunities. the overarching goal of detroit pal…

Human Services
7
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan

The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…

Education
8
Michigan High School Athletic Assoc

To conduct interscholastic athletic tournaments throughout the state, consistent with educational values of high school curriculums, to provide assistance in the training of coaches, athletic directors and officials, as well as the…

Education
9
American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan

Freedom, equality, and justicethe bill of rights declared that we have rights and liberties that the government shouldn't interfere with. rights like the freedom of speech and our right to a speedy trial that are the cornerstone of our…

10
Michigan Psychiatric Society

Mission is to represent the interests and professional needs of psychiatric physicians in michigan while striving to ensure quality care for people with mental disorders and their families through promotion of education, research and…

11
Michigan Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians

To support quality emergency care and to promote the interests and values of emergency physicians in the state of michigan.

12
Michigan College Access Network

Our goal: increase the percentage of michigan residents with postsecondary certificates or degrees to 60 percent by the year 2030.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Homer Skelton Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Ice Hockey ProgramsVeteran Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Sports Booster Organi…Fallen First Responder Supp…Community Arts OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr13%18%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr15%29%20–35yr14%11%35–55yr18%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%16%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr15%14%20–35yr14%2%35–55yr18%67%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,825

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

American Chinese Association — $58,795 · OtherAmerican Chinese AssociationMATRIX HUMAN SERVICES — $47,400 · OtherMATRIX HUMAN SERVICESMidwest Buddhist Meditation Center — $44,300 · OtherMidwest Buddhist Meditation CenterMichigan Asian Youth Education Foundation — $32,443 · OtherMichigan Asian Youth Education FoundationFILAMCCO — $31,192 · OtherFILAMCCOTHE SHUL — $25,050 · OtherTHE SHULIndividual grant recipient — $21,170 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMichigan Asian Youth Enrichment Foundation — $13,708 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $12,650 · Other+35 more — $64,556 · Other+35 moreDETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $75,300 · EducationDETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCH…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $28,500 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY+3 more — $5,750 · EducationCouncil of Asian Pacific Americans — $22,327 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CHINESE SCHOOL OF GREATER DETROIT — $5,200 · Arts & CultureKOREAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER OF MICHIGAN — $2,250 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY — $1,570 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $600 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN YOUTH EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION — $10,471 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,287 · HealthCOMMON GROUND — $500 · HealthTROY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $1,500 · Recreation & SportsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,600 · Human ServicesTHE TOM KOWALSKI FOUNDATION INC — $800 · Human Services
Other$351,264Education$109,550Arts & Culture$31,947Youth Development$10,471Health$7,787Recreation & Sports$5,500Human Services$2,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $75,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMATRIX HUMAN SERVICES — $47,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $28,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil of Asian Pacific Americans — $22,327 over 4y, 16% of budgetMICHIGAN YOUTH EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION — $10,471 over 2y, 26% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $7,287 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CHINESE SCHOOL OF GREATER DETROIT — $5,200 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTROY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY — $1,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SOUTHFIELD POLICE — $1,250 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $1,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFARMINGTON HILLS POLICE AND FIRE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHomer Skelton Charitable Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHE TOM KOWALSKI FOUNDATION INC — $800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHINESE GOLF ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN — $600 over 1y, 23% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CHINESE AUTO ENGINEERS — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds MATRIX HUMAN SERVICES
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Council of Asian Pacific Americans
  • Who funds MICHIGAN YOUTH EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CHINESE SCHOOL OF GREATER DETROIT
  • Who funds TROY YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds PHILIPPINE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds KOREAN AMERICAN CULTURAL CENTER OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SOUTHFIELD POLICE
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI18.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Jewish Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Page Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Page Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Page Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph