Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paddison Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$173k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$305kHealth$255kAnimals$179kEducation$174kReligion$147kEnvironment$132kPhilanthropy$103kCrime & Legal$88kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $113k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KNOXVILLE-ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS$15,000
INTERFAITH HEALTH CLINIC$14,000
KNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY CAC$14,000
FOUNTAIN CITY MINISTRY CENTER$14,000
FRIENDS OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK$12,000
WESLEY HOUSE FOUNDATION$12,000
SUSANNAH'S HOUSE$12,000
MARYVILLE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
ST PAUL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$8,000
EMERALD AVE YOUTH FOUNDATION$6,000
THE COVERING HOUSE$5,000
FOCUS GROUP PRISON MINISTRY$5,000
MEN OF VALOR$5,000
YOUNG WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDHELP: $4k → 11%CHILDHELP: $4k → 11%CHILDHELP: $4k → 11%CHILDHELP: $4k → 11%CHILDHELP: $4k → 11%HELPING MAMAS: $2k → 12%HELPING MAMAS: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Paddison Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in TN; by stated purpose, 84%.

Paddison Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 34 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+9%

Still filing today

53%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    INTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +256%
  • FC
    FOUNTAIN CITY MINISTRY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +51%
  • SH
    SUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $87k · revenue +295%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • LU
    LEE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +9%
  • PS
    PELLISSIPPI STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennessee Children's Home Inc

Tennessee children's home, inc. is a not-for-profit organization that provides a home for neglected and pre-delinquent children who have an unstable family situation and who are beginning to develop problems which cannot be solved in their…

Human Services
2
Welcome House Knoxville

Our Mission at Welcome House Knoxville is to share the love of Jesus through the ministries of hospitality and friendship. We provide safe and loving homes for individuals and families in transition to permanent housing.

Housing & Shelter
3
The Samaritan Center Inc

To meet the basic physical, spiritual, and social need of people in our area using the ministry of Jesus as a model.

Religion
4
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
5
Samaritan House Inc

Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.

Housing & Shelter
6
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
7
Hendersonville Rescue Mission

Non-denominational christian mission whose purpose is to assist those in need of shelter, food and clothing in the henderson county, north carolina area.

—
8
Mercy Center Ministries

The mission of mercy center ministries inc. is to provide homeless women who are single, pregnant, and/or parenting with shelter, supportive services and community resources which will enable them to become independent, empowered, and…

Human Services
9
Austin Street Center

The mission of austin street center is to provide emergency shelter and related services to the homeless. programs provide crisis intervention, substance abuse awareness information and opportunities to improve present life situations to…

—
10
Nashville Rescue Mission

Nashville rescue mission, formerly known as nrm holdings, inc., fein 45-2424130, continues the mission services established in 1954, by nashville rescue mission, fein 62-6018832. following god's command to love our neighbors as ourselves,…

Housing & Shelter
11
Luke's House- a Clinic for Healing and Hope

Luke's house provides medical and spiritual hope, health, and healing to greater new orleans residents, creates patient-centered experiences for students, and connects patients to long-term healthcare solutions.

Health
12
Heart Mountain Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

The organization was created to glorify god by serving his people, especially those facing unplanned pregnancies. this includes rendering christian service, material aid, medical services and spiritual direction to women and men faced with…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of East Tennessee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY CAC: $126,000 · OtherKNOXVILLE-KNOX COUNTY CACMARYVILLE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $118,000 · OtherMARYVILLE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDFRIENDS OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK: $108,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARKWESLEY HOUSE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherWESLEY HOUSE FOUNDATIONST PAUL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $80,000 · OtherST PAUL UNITED METHODIST CHURCHFOCUS GROUP PRISON MINISTRY: $73,000 · OtherFOCUS GROUP PRISON MINISTRYSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $61,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKEMERALD AVE YOUTH FOUNDATION: $46,000 · OtherLOST SHEEP MINISTRY: $34,000 · Other+15 more: $127,500 · Other+15 moreINTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER: $122,000 · HealthINTERFAITH HEALT…SUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $86,550 · HealthSUSANNAH'S HOUSE…ASSISI HOUSE: $13,500 · HealthASSISI HOUSE+2 more: $5,600 · HealthKNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INC: $135,000 · AnimalsKNOXVILLE ZOO…YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN: $44,000 · AnimalsYOUNG-WILLIAM…FOUNTAIN CITY MINISTRY CENTER: $118,000 · Food & NutritionTHE COVERING HOUSE: $43,000 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesHELPING MAMAS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $41,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $23,000 · InternationalGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,000 · Environment
Other$873,500Health$227,650Animals$179,000Food & Nutrition$118,000Human Services$67,000International$64,000Environment$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INC: $135,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER: $122,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFOUNTAIN CITY MINISTRY CENTER: $118,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetSUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $86,550 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN: $44,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COVERING HOUSE: $43,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL: $41,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEN OF VALOR: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetASSISI HOUSE: $13,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER MINISTRY CENTER: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARSON-NEWMAN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING MAMAS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF EAST TENNESSEE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL FOR ALZHEIMER'S LTD: $2,100 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KNOXVILLE ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN CITY MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SUSANNAH'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG-WILLIAMS ANIMAL CENTER OF EAST TEN ↗
  • Who funds THE COVERING HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds MEN OF VALOR ↗
  • Who funds GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISI HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CARSON-NEWMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HELPING MAMAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF EAST TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PEDAL FOR ALZHEIMER'S LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Tennessee FoundationTN19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Tennessee Foundation · Akima Club Inc · Gene & Florence Monday Foundation Inc · The Clayton Family Foundation · The Boyd Foundation · Bill and Crissy Haslam Foundation · United Way of Greater Knoxvilleinc · Thompson Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paddison Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paddison Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paddison’s filings →

    More from the funding graph