Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Paddington Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$21k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Education$28kArts & Culture$17kHuman Services$17kReligion$6kHealth$4kRecreation & Sports$4kAnimals$425Food & Nutrition$350Other$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VINTAGE INC$15,288
PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
ST MARGARET'S FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $35 → 14%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $70 → 7%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $190 → 11%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $100 → 11%VINTAGE INC: $15k → 11%VINTAGE INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$70k · 26 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
26

Total granted

$70k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+13%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $24k · revenue +243%
  • VI
    VINTAGE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $16k · revenue +16%
  • PS
    PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $13k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • HS
    HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +25%
  • PP
    PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

3
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
6
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
7
The Personal Care Products Council Inc

The personal care products council (pcpc) represents the cosmetics and personal care products industry. pcpc advocates for the industry's future and effectively positions our companies so they can continue to provide safe and innovative…

8
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
9
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
10
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Humane Farm Animal Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesClassical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersVeteran Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Animal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsHomeless Services & ShelterFood Pantries & AssistanceGovernment Accountability R…Community Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Independent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr15%28%35–55yr17%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr15%29%35–55yr17%31%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,131

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $23,500 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY+1 more — $500 · EducationPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC — $12,500 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INCHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $1,879 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WE…PITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION — $1,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATE…1891 FREDONIA OPERA HOUSE INC — $600 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA — $600 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $750 · Arts & CultureVINTAGE INC — $16,288 · Human ServicesVINTAGE INC+3 more — $395 · Human ServicesST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $5,100 · OtherST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL…PENN STATE UNIVERSITY — $3,500 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSIT…Individual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…+28 more — $3,293 · Other+28 moreAspinwall Riverfront Park Inc — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsST MARGARET FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $630 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $503 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH — $250 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $120 · Health+1 more — $60 · HealthGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $350 · Food & Nutrition
Education$24,000Arts & Culture$17,329Human Services$16,683Other$14,893Recreation & Sports$4,000Health$3,563Food & Nutrition$350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $23,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetVINTAGE INC — $16,288 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAspinwall Riverfront Park Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST MARGARET FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $1,879 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $630 over 3y, 0.0% of budget1891 FREDONIA OPERA HOUSE INC — $600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $503 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $290 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH — $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $120 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $118 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $70 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Farm Animal Care — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare — $44 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family FoundationsPA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Burke Family Foundation · The Burke Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · The Fine Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Richard and Dana Green Philanthropic Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · Allegheny Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Paddington Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph