Skip to content

· Public charity

Pacific Islanders in Communications

The mission of PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN COMMUNICATIONS (pic) is to support, advance, and develop pacific island media content and talent that enhances public recognition of and appreciation for pacific islander history, culture and society.

$871k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$3.0MCommunity Improvement$208kScience & Tech$129kEmployment$28kEnvironment$21kPublic Benefit$17k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $710,025, the rows itemized in this filing. The $870,758 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $160,733 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $399k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $285k
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TERRA CARRERE LLC$75,000
NIU DOC LLC$60,000
MOUNGA PICTURES LLC$50,000
WORM MEDIA LLC$50,000
ROOY MEDIA LLC$50,000
NINTH ISLAND DOCUMENTARY LLC$41,525
WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG$40,000
DOC SOCIETY INC$40,000
OLONA MEDIA LLC$38,000
WOMEN MAKES MOVIES$30,000
THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC$26,500
ROCK SALT MEDIA INC$25,000
GRACE FILM LLC$25,000
ISLAND SOLDIER LLC$25,000
'OHINA LABS$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $49k → 16%PICTOGRAPH PRODUCTIONS LLC: $25k → 8%NIU DOC LLC: $60k → 11%TADASHI NAKAMURALITTLE TOKYO SERVICE CENTER: $70k → 14%MAKAUILA INC: $65k → 9%NATIONAL BLACK PROGRAMMING CONSORTIUM DBA BLACK PUBLIC MEDIA: $25k → 17%ISLAND SOLDIER: $45k → 20%CHRIS A JOHNS MEDIA LLC: $29k → 19%MOUNGA PICTURES LLC: $50k → 13%ROOY MEDIA LLC: $50k → 6%WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG: $40k → 19%NIU DOC LLC: $30k → 11%GRACE FILM LLC: $25k → 9%WOMEN MAKES MOVIES: $30k → 17%ESSENTIAL ISLANDERS LLC: $40k → 20%TERRA CARRERE LLC: $120k → 15%CHRIS A JOHNS MEDIA LLC: $25k → 19%ROOY MEDIA LLC: $25k → 6%LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $50k → 14%LEHUA FILMS LLC: $30k → 9%WNET: $60k → 17%ISLAND SOLDIER LLC: $25k → 20%TERRA CARRERE LLC: $75k → 15%WNET: $60k → 17%WNET: $40k → 17%KETCHUP ENTERTAINMENT LTD: $45k → 14%DOC SOCIETY INC: $40k → 20%FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC: $30k → 17%DOC SOCIETY INC: $40k → 20%THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $55k → 14%WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $30k → 17%THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $27k → 14%KANAKA PAKIPIKA LLC: $85k → 9%EVERY DAY IN KAIMUKI LLC: $50k → 9%QWAVES: $45k → 9%QWAVES: $45k → 9%KANAKA PAKIPIKA: $45k → 9%QWAVES LLC: $34k → 9%ROCK SALT MEDIA INC: $197k → 9%ROCK SALT MEDIA INC: $105k → 9%MAKING WAVES FILMS LLC: $50k → 9%HONOLULU CIVIL BEAT INC: $35k → 9%MAKING WAVES FILMS LLC: $35k → 9%THE QUEENS FLOWERS LLC: $80k → 9%WORM MEDIA LLC: $50k → 9%NINTH ISLAND DOCUMENTARY LLC: $42k → 9%NINTH ISLAND DOCUMENTARY LLC: $30k → 9%OLONA MEDIA LLC: $38k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CA
MD
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 46 repeat orgs$579k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
23

Total granted

$3.5M
$473k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+19%

Still filing today

22%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterEnvironmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $118k · revenue +117%
  • THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +64%
  • LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $92k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • ED
    EVERY DAY IN KAIMUKI LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • LP
    LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +25%
  • KE
    KETCHUP ENTERTAINMENT LTD
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Filmmakers Collaborative

Filmmakers Collaborative is a non-profit media organization with a mission to catalyze positive change though the power of filmmaking. Significant activities to support our mission in 2024 were the screenings and fundraising for the For Us…

Arts & Culture
2
WorkingFilms Inc

Recognizing the power of film to inspire, Working Films positions documentaries to increase civic engagement and shift culture at the local, state, and national level.

Arts & Culture
3
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
4
Pacific Islanders in Communications

The mission of pacific islanders in communications (pic) is to support, advance, and develop pacific island media content and talent that enhances public recognition of and appreciation for pacific islander history, culture and society.

Unclassified
5
Reel Earth Films

Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
7
Docs in Progress Inc

Docs in progress is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization which gives individuals the tools to tell stories through documentary film to educate, inspire, and transform the way people view their world.

Arts & Culture
8
Dc Dox

Dc dox is a major international film festival in the nation's capital dedicated to promoting documentary film as a leading art form, championing new voices and innovations in non-fiction storytelling, and using film as a catalyst to engage…

—
9
Cousin Collective Inc

COUSIN is a collective supporting Indigenous artists expanding the form of film. We are building an Indigenous-led film movement. We create work that is personal, proudly provocative and driven by strong, artistic voices. We celebrate this…

Arts & Culture
10
The Filmmaker Fund
Philanthropy
11
Fund for Innovative Tv

The fund for innovative tv has been producing challenging documentary video and television since 1990. it currrently operates the media burn archive, whose mission is to use archival media to deepen context and encourage critical thought…

Arts & Culture
12
Newport Film Inc

Newport film inspires, educates, and entertains by presenting current and impactful documentaries that build community and propel change.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Independent Documentary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Popolo Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCK SALT MEDIA INC: $499,503 · OtherROCK SALT MEDIA INCTERRA CARRERE LLC: $216,000 · OtherTERRA CARRERE LLCKANAKA PAKIPIKA LLC: $165,000 · OtherISLAND SOLDIER: $155,000 · OtherQWAVES: $141,540 · OtherTHE QUEENS FLOWERS LLC: $125,000 · OtherMAKING WAVES FILMS LLC: $113,000 · OtherNIU DOC LLC: $110,000 · OtherNINTH ISLAND DOCUMENTARY LLC: $104,025 · Other+46 more: $1,471,300 · Other+46 moreWNET: $193,846 · Arts & CultureWNETTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $117,500 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE…THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $105,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPEN…MAKAUILA INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureMAKAUILA INCHAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMAKING: $73,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMA…WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCLATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLATINO PUBLIC BROADCAS…Honolulu Civil Beat Inc: $35,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $96,000 · Arts & Culture+6 moreLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $91,500 · Housing & ShelterDOC SOCIETY INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyFIRELIGHT MEDIA INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsREDFORD CENTER INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$3,100,368Arts & Culture$815,346Housing & Shelter$91,500Philanthropy$80,000Civil Rights$30,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWNET: $193,846 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $117,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $91,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDOC SOCIETY INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMAKAUILA INC: $75,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetHAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMAKING: $73,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHonolulu Civil Beat Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFIRELIGHT MEDIA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY-BASED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $8,355 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds DOC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKAUILA INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMAKING ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
  • Who funds Honolulu Civil Beat Inc ↗
  • Who funds FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Asian American MediaCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Asian American Media · Wyncote Foundation · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pacific Islanders in Communications funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pacific Islanders in Communications. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pacific Islanders in Communications?

Find your warmest path to Pacific Islanders in Communications through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pacific Islanders in Communications’ filings →

More from the funding graph