Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pacific Islanders in Communications

The mission of PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN COMMUNICATIONS (pic) is to support, advance, and develop pacific island media content and talent that enhances public recognition of and appreciation for pacific islander history, culture and society.

$475k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$3.0MCommunity Improvement$208kScience & Tech$129kEmployment$28kEnvironment$21kPublic Benefit$17k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $447,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $475,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $325k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$21,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC$55,000
ROCK SALT MEDIA INC$55,000
DOC SOCIETY INC$40,000
ESSENTIAL ISLANDERS LLC$40,000
NIU DOC LLC$30,000
FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC$30,000
WNET$25,000
ROOY MEDIA LLC$25,000
HAWAII WOMEN IN FILMING$21,000
WHAT TOOK YOU SO LONG$20,000
A LITTLE STARTUP LLC$17,000
LEHUA FILMS LLC$17,000
SINA FILMS LLC$15,000
EAT THE FISH LLC$15,000
CENTER OF INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $49k → 16%PICTOGRAPH PRODUCTIONS LLC: $25k → 8%NIU DOC LLC: $20k → 9%NIU DOC LLC: $30k → 11%TADASHI NAKAMURALITTLE TOKYO SERVICE CENTER: $70k → 14%MAKAUILA INC: $65k → 9%NATIONAL BLACK PROGRAMMING CONSORTIUM DBA BLACK PUBLIC MEDIA: $25k → 17%ISLAND SOLDIER: $45k → 20%LAST HAWAIIAN SUGAR FILMS LLC: $22k → 10%TERRA CARRERE LLC: $21k → 15%CHRIS A JOHNS MEDIA LLC: $29k → 19%ROOY MEDIA LLC: $25k → 6%TADASHI NAKAMURALITTLE TOKYO SERVICE CENTER: $22k → 14%LEHUA FILMS LLC: $30k → 9%WNET: $60k → 17%ESSENTIAL ISLANDERS LLC: $40k → 20%TERRA CARRERE LLC: $120k → 15%CHRIS A JOHNS MEDIA LLC: $25k → 19%THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $21k → 8%LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $50k → 14%WNET: $60k → 17%HAWAII WOMEN IN FILMING: $21k → 9%WNET: $40k → 17%WNET: $25k → 17%DOC SOCIETY INC: $40k → 20%KETCHUP ENTERTAINMENT LTD: $45k → 14%FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC: $30k → 17%WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $30k → 17%THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $55k → 14%THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $21k → 14%KANAKA PAKIPIKA LLC: $85k → 9%EVERY DAY IN KAIMUKI LLC: $50k → 9%KANAKA PAKIPIKA: $45k → 9%QWAVES: $45k → 9%QWAVES: $45k → 9%QWAVES LLC: $34k → 9%ROCK SALT MEDIA INC: $197k → 9%ROCK SALT MEDIA INC: $105k → 9%ROCK SALT MEDIA INC: $23k → 9%MAKING WAVES FILMS LLC: $50k → 9%HONOLULU CIVIL BEAT INC: $35k → 9%MAKING WAVES FILMS LLC: $35k → 9%MAKING WAVES FILMS LLC: $22k → 9%LEHUA FILMS LLC: $25k → 9%MAKAWALU FILMS LLC: $25k → 9%THE QUEENS FLOWERS LLC: $80k → 9%NINTH ISLAND DOCUMENTARY LLC: $30k → 9%NINTH ISLAND DOCUMENTARY: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CA
MD
DC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 42 repeat orgs$563k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
21

Total granted

$2.9M
$426k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+25%

Still filing today

21%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterEnvironmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $92k · revenue +115%
  • TF
    THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $91k · revenue +117%
  • THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • ED
    EVERY DAY IN KAIMUKI LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • LP
    LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +25%
  • KE
    KETCHUP ENTERTAINMENT LTD
    one grant, 2017 · $45k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Filmmakers Collaborative

Filmmakers Collaborative is a non-profit media organization with a mission to catalyze positive change though the power of filmmaking. Significant activities to support our mission in 2024 were the screenings and fundraising for the For Us…

Arts & Culture
2
WorkingFilms Inc

Recognizing the power of film to inspire, Working Films positions documentaries to increase civic engagement and shift culture at the local, state, and national level.

Arts & Culture
3
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture
4
Field of Vision Inc

Field of Vision is a filmmaker and artist driven organization that commissions, creates and supports original nonfiction films about developing and ongoing stories around the globe. Field of Vision supports work that uses innovative and…

Arts & Culture
5
Reel Earth Films

Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.

Arts & Culture
6
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
7
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

8
The Filmmaker Fund
Philanthropy
9
Newport Film Inc

Newport film inspires, educates, and entertains by presenting current and impactful documentaries that build community and propel change.

Arts & Culture
10
Docs in Progress Inc

Docs in progress is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization which gives individuals the tools to tell stories through documentary film to educate, inspire, and transform the way people view their world.

Arts & Culture
11
National Film Preservation Foundation

The NFPF is a nonprofit organization established in the District of Columbia resulting from an Act of Congress in order to preserve and make publicly accessible our nations film heritage. The NFPF works with archives to preserve American…

Arts & Culture
12
Fund for Innovative Tv

The fund for innovative tv has been producing challenging documentary video and television since 1990. it currrently operates the media burn archive, whose mission is to use archival media to deepen context and encourage critical thought…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc and the most unlike its peers is Popolo Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROCK SALT MEDIA INC — $474,503 · OtherROCK SALT MEDIA INCKANAKA PAKIPIKA LLC — $165,000 · OtherKANAKA PAKIPIKA LLCQWAVES — $141,540 · OtherQWAVESTERRA CARRERE LLC — $141,000 · OtherTERRA CARRERE LLCTHE QUEENS FLOWERS LLC — $125,000 · OtherISLAND SOLDIER — $110,000 · OtherMAKING WAVES FILMS LLC — $107,000 · OtherLEHUA FILMS LLC — $94,500 · Other+44 more — $1,172,300 · Other+44 moreWNET — $193,846 · Arts & CultureWNETTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $91,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE …THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC — $85,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPEND…MAKAUILA INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureMAKAUILA INCHAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMAKING — $55,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMAK…LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING — $50,000 · Arts & CultureLATINO PUBLIC BROADCAST…WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $40,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCHonolulu Civil Beat Inc — $35,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $25,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $40,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $91,500 · Housing & ShelterDOC SOCIETY INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyFIRELIGHT MEDIA INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsREDFORD CENTER INC — $10,000 · Environment
Other$2,530,843Arts & Culture$714,846Housing & Shelter$91,500Philanthropy$40,000Civil Rights$30,000Environment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWNET — $193,846 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $91,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $91,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC — $85,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMAKAUILA INC — $75,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetHAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMAKING — $55,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetLATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDOC SOCIETY INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHonolulu Civil Beat Inc — $35,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFIRELIGHT MEDIA INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAWAII ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY-BASED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $8,355 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WNET
  • Who funds LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
  • Who funds MAKAUILA INC
  • Who funds HAWAII WOMEN IN FILMMAKING
  • Who funds LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING
  • Who funds DOC SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC
  • Who funds Honolulu Civil Beat Inc
  • Who funds FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC
  • Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC
  • Who funds BLACK PUBLIC MEDIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Asian American MediaCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Asian American Media · Wyncote Foundation · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pacific Islanders in Communications funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc6% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pacific Islanders in Communications?

Find your warmest path to Pacific Islanders in Communications through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph