Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pacific Harmony Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$848kHuman Services$15kHealth$10kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER$25,000
Oakland East Bay Symphony$20,000
Musicambia$20,000
UC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES$10,000
Ojai Music Festival$10,000
East Bay Center for the Performing$10,000
American Composers Orchestra$7,500
New Music USA$5,000
Contemporaneous$5,000
BERKELEY SYMPHONY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 41% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%East Bay Center for the Performing: $30k → 9%SF SYMPHONY: $5k → 10%CABRILLO FESTIVAL OF CONTEMP MUSIC: $8k → 13%Contemporaneous: $5k → 17%Musicambia: $40k → 20%East Bay Center for the Performing: $15k → 9%Paul Dresher Ensemble: $5k → 10%CABRILLO FESTIVAL OF CONTEMP MUSIC: $8k → 13%Contemporaneous: $5k → 17%Musicambia: $20k → 20%East Bay Center for the Performing: $10k → 9%CABRILLO FESTIVAL OF CONTEMP MUSIC: $5k → 13%Alarm Will Sound: $5k → 17%Musicambia: $20k → 20%East Bay Center for the Performing: $10k → 9%Oakland East Bay Symphony: $20k → 10%Musicambia: $20k → 20%East Bay Center for the Performing: $5k → 9%Oakland East Bay Symphony: $20k → 10%LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOC: $40k → 14%Alarm Will Sound: $5k → 17%Musicambia: $20k → 20%East Bay Center for the Performing: $5k → 9%Oakland East Bay Symphony: $20k → 10%INTL CONTEMORARY ENSEMBLE: $8k → 20%Oakland East Bay Symphony: $20k → 10%Wild Up: $13k → 14%Alarm Will Sound: $5k → 17%INTL CONTEMORARY ENSEMBLE: $8k → 20%Oakland Symphony: $5k → 10%Wild Up: $5k → 14%American Composers Orchestra: $10k → 17%American Composers Orchestra: $8k → 17%New Music USA: $10k → 17%UC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES: $20k → 10%New Music USA: $6k → 17%UC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES: $20k → 10%UC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES: $10k → 10%UC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES: $10k → 10%UC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES: $10k → 10%UC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES: $10k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $40k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $25k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $25k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $20k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $20k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $20k → 10%CROWDEN MUSIC CENTER: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$882k · 19 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$882k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
-19%

Still filing today

68%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Crowden Music Center
    7× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +12%
  • MI
    MUSICAMBIA INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +404% · 32% of their budget
  • EB
    EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • PB
    Pacific Boychoir Academy
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Modern Opera
2
Vanguard Concerts
3
San Jose Chamber Music Society

To present chamber music concerts in San Jose performed by top ensembles from the Bay Area, across America, and around the world. To enrich our audience experience through post-concert Q&As, program notes, and meet-the-composer…

4
California Bach Society Inc

Choral Music Performances: California Bach Society is a 30-voice chamber choir known for finely wrought interpretations of Renaissance and Baroque music, often accompanied by leading period instrumentalists. Each season, the choir performs…

5
Roger Shapiro Fund for New Music
Arts & Culture
6
American Chamber Ensemble Inc

The American Chamber Ensemble is a consortium of distinguished musicians whose concerts explore the music for piano with strings, woodwinds and/or voice, presenting both great standard repertoire and living American composers.

7
New Century Chamber Orchestra

New century chamber orchestra, a virtuoso, conductorless string ensemble founded in 1992, presents performances of extraordinary quality in the san francisco bay area with a commitment to innovation, education, and accessibility.

Arts & Culture
8
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
9
Voices of Silicon Valley

Community Music / Arts Organization

Arts & Culture
10
Seattle Chamber Orchestra

Gather diverse and talented musicians, professionals and amateurs, to curate and perform orchestral repertoire that uplifts, inspires, and celebrates live performances, as well as offer educational activities concerning music.

Arts & Culture
11
New Amsterdam Symphony Orchestra

Advancement of the art of music and public knowledge therefor by producing performances. Featuring emerging conductors and musical soloists.

Arts & Culture
12
Cor Cantiamo Nfp

Promote Contemporary Choral Music

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Music Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jacaranda. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Crowden Music Center — $170,000 · OtherThe Crowden Music CenterMUSICAMBIA INC — $120,000 · OtherMUSICAMBIA INCUC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCES — $80,000 · OtherUC REGENTS CAL PERFORMANCESLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOC — $43,750 · OtherLA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCBERKELEY SYMPHONY — $25,000 · OtherCABRILLO FESTIVAL OF CONTEMPORARY MUSIC — $20,000 · Other+7 more — $46,000 · Other+7 moreEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY — $95,000 · Arts & CultureEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONYEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts — $75,000 · Arts & CultureEast Bay Center for the Performing ArtsOJAI FESTIVALS LTD — $68,750 · Arts & CultureOJAI FESTIVALS LTDNEW MUSIC USA INC — $41,000 · Arts & CultureNEW MUSIC USA INCAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC — $32,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INCWILD UP — $22,500 · Arts & CultureWILD UPALARM WILL SOUND INC — $15,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $27,000 · Arts & Culture+3 moreOther Minds — $11,000 · EducationJACARANDA — $10,000 · International
Other$504,750Arts & Culture$376,750Education$11,000International$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Crowden Music Center — $170,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMUSICAMBIA INC — $120,000 over 5y, 32% of budgetEAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY — $95,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts — $75,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetOJAI FESTIVALS LTD — $68,750 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNEW MUSIC USA INC — $41,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC — $32,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetWILD UP — $22,500 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetCABRILLO FESTIVAL OF CONTEMPORARY MUSIC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCONTEMPORANEOUS INC — $12,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetOther Minds — $11,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetJACARANDA — $10,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetPacific Boychoir Academy — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Crowden Music Center
  • Who funds MUSICAMBIA INC
  • Who funds EAST BAY PERFORMING ARTS dba OAKLAND SYMPHONY
  • Who funds East Bay Center for the Performing Arts
  • Who funds OJAI FESTIVALS LTD
  • Who funds NEW MUSIC USA INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds WILD UP
  • Who funds CABRILLO FESTIVAL OF CONTEMPORARY MUSIC
  • Who funds ALARM WILL SOUND INC
  • Who funds CONTEMPORANEOUS INC
  • Who funds Other Minds
  • Who funds JACARANDA
  • Who funds WEST EDGE OPERA
  • Who funds Pacific Boychoir Academy

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Amphion Foundation Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLPNY24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Amphion Foundation Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · The Aaron Copland Fund for Music Inc Co Alter Kendrick & Baron LLP · Ann & Gordon Getty Foundation · New Music USA Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pacific Harmony Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pacific Harmony Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pacific Harmony Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph