Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pacific Education Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$235kHuman Services$55kPhilanthropy$20kEmployment$10kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$986k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
College Track$25,000
Help 4 Kids$15,000
North Bay Childrens Center$10,000
Steves Camp at Horizon Farms$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%North Bay Childrens Center: $10k → 8%Help 4 Kids: $15k → 13%Pledge to Humanity: $10k → 9%Help 4 Kids: $10k → 13%Pledge to Humanity: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 3 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$270k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+293%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    COLLEGE TRACK
    7× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +190%
  • H4
    HELP 4 KIDS
    2× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • PT
    Pledge to Humanity
    2× · 2018–2020 · $20k · revenue -25%

Funded once

  • AB
    ABRAZOS & BOOKS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -19% · 63% of their budget
  • GW
    GENESYS WORKSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +293%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys Hope Girls Hope of San Francisco

Boys Hope Girls Hope nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others. Offering direct educational programming and support as well as college admission assistance and…

—
2
Bay Scholars

Bay scholars exists to make it possible for promising low-income students across the san francisco bay area to have access to and flourish at successful college preparatory catholic high schools.

Education
3
High Tech High

High tech high's mission is to develop and support innovative public schools where all students develop the academic, workplace and citizenship skills for postsecondary success.

Education
4
Berkeley Community Scholars Dba Berkeley Community Fund

Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.

Philanthropy
5
Jewish Commmunity High School of the Bay

JCHS is a college preparatory high school committed to integrating deep learning, wisdom, and Jewish values. We empower students to embrace their Jewish identity, generate empathy and compassion, delight in lifelong education, and improve…

Education
6
Genesys Works Group Return Dba Genesys Works

To provide pathways to career success for high school students in underserved communities through skills training, meaningful work experiences, and impactful relationships.

—
7
Children's Health Council Inc

Children's health council's mission is to transform young lives by providing culturally-responsible best-in-class services for learning differences and mental health to families from diverse backgrounds regardless of language, location or…

Health
8
First Graduate

First graduate's mission is to help students become the first in their families to graduate from college ready to pursue a career that is meaningful to them. we are a 12-year+ free program-recruiting students in 6th grade. offerings…

Youth Development
9
California Young World Inc

To provide a quality child development program in an atmosphere conducive to the development of the whole child.

Human Services
10
Coastside Childrens Programs

Coastside childrens programs (ccp) mission is to provide a safe and caring environment where children learn through experience, play, and friendships - building a foundation for success in school and life. ccp is offering preschool…

Human Services
11
Bridge the Gap College Prep

The mission of Bridge the Gap is to provide comprehensive educational, social and emotional resources to underserved students in Marin City and Southern Marin. Our goal is to ensure that all students graduate high school, and achieve their…

Youth Development
12
The Family Giving Tree

By inspiring community kindness, generosity, and volunteerism. the family giving tree fulfills exact holiday wishes and provides backpacks filled with school supplies to those in need.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Bay Childrens Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pledge to Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE TRACK: $225,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACKSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $20,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INCABRAZOS & BOOKS: $10,000 · EducationGENESYS WORKS: $10,000 · EducationHELP 4 KIDS: $25,000 · Human ServicesHELP 4 KIDSPledge to Humanity: $20,000 · Human ServicesPledge to HumanityNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNORTH BAY CHILDREN…STEVES CAMP AT HORIZON FARMS INC: $10,000 · Youth Development
Education$265,000Human Services$55,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLLEGE TRACK: $225,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHELP 4 KIDS: $25,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPledge to Humanity: $20,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetABRAZOS & BOOKS: $10,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetNORTH BAY CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENESYS WORKS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEVES CAMP AT HORIZON FARMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pacific Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pacific Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pacific Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph