Skip to content

· Private foundation

P&N Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$188kHuman Services$21kHousing & Shelter$12kYouth Development$8kInternational$6kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$1,100
Median grant
6
States reached
$881k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE CHAPEL$21,700
Various People in Need$8,049
Great Divide Calvary Chapel$3,674
Juniper Refuge$3,055
Young Life$2,800
Mission to North America - Abel Sisco$2,200
LifePoint Church$1,100
Building Hope Summit County$1,100
F Street Neighborhood Church$1,100
Transformations Thrift Store$1,100
Student Mobilization$1,100
NeighborWorks Lincoln$1,100
Reconnected Foundation$1,000
Gotta Be Me Inc$1,000
Mission to the World$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Gotta Be Me Inc: $1k → 12%Gotta Be Me Inc: $1k → 12%Gotta Be Me Inc: $1k → 12%Gotta Be Me Inc: $1k → 12%Transformations Thrift Store: $1k → 13%Transformations Thrift Store: $1k → 13%Transformations Thrift Store: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$241k · 16 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$241k
$2k

Still filing today

44%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +18%
  • PC
    PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $6k · revenue +45%
  • NI
    NEIGHBORHOODS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • YL
    Young Life
    one grant, 2019 · $900
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
2
Refugee Empowerment Center

To resettle refugees in nebraska and provide them the support they need to thrive.

—
3
Eagles Hope Transitions

Eagles Hope provides temporary housing to families and individuals that are at risk of homelessness. Residents pay a low fee for housing and must agree to seek employement, abide by the drug and alcohol free policy and develope a…

Housing & Shelter
4
Kansas Recovery Network
Health
5
Outlinc Inc Outnebraska

We believe in a nebraska free of judgment and filled with love. every day we see this dream spreading through communities across our state, with resources and events for lgbtq+ people.

Arts & Culture
6
Furniture Project Omaha

Provide assistance to those in-need within our community. We want to not only provide furniture but also inspire hope to show them that their neighbors care about them.

Housing & Shelter
7
New Life Recovery Services
Health
8
New Community Development Corporation

Provides safe, affordable and quality housing for low and moderate income families in Douglas & Sarpy NE & Pottawattamie County IA, with an emphasis in Omaha/Council Bluffs metropolitan area.

Housing & Shelter
9
Restoration House of Greater Kansas City

ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.

Housing & Shelter
10
The Well Ne

The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…

Health
11
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
12
New Visions Homeless Services

Provide help, hope and opportunities to our neighbors who are experiencing homelessness and hunger in the Council Bluffs and Omaha communities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People's City Mission; the most unlike its peers is Gotta Be Me Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE CHAPEL: $136,968 · OtherGRACE CHAPELGREAT DIVIDE CALVARY CHAPEL: $26,066 · OtherGREAT DIVIDE CALVARY CHAPELIndividual grant recipient: $12,529 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVarious People in Need: $8,049 · Other+10 more: $34,477 · Other+10 moreJUNIPER REFUGE: $5,121 · Human ServicesGotta Be Me Inc: $4,600 · Human ServicesTRANSFORMATIONS THRIFT STORE: $3,500 · Human ServicesPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $5,937 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOODS INC: $5,800 · Housing & ShelterYOUNG LIFE: $7,450 · Youth DevelopmentBuilding Hope Summit County: $3,400 · Health
Other$218,089Human Services$13,221Housing & Shelter$11,737Youth Development$7,450Health$3,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE: $7,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $5,937 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOODS INC: $5,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIPER REFUGE: $5,121 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGotta Be Me Inc: $4,600 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTRANSFORMATIONS THRIFT STORE: $3,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBuilding Hope Summit County: $3,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetReconnected Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIPER REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds Gotta Be Me Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATIONS THRIFT STORE ↗
  • Who funds Building Hope Summit County ↗
  • Who funds Reconnected Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization P&N Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from P&N Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on P&N’s filings →

    More from the funding graph