Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$58kHuman Services$40kHealth$22kArts & Culture$20kPhilanthropy$9kYouth Development$7kRecreation & Sports$6kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$31,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$592k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
North Naples Church$31,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Holmes Christmas Club: $3k → 11%Holmes Christmas Club: $3k → 11%Holmes Christmas Club: $3k → 11%Holmes Christmas Club: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 18 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$162k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+22%

Still filing today

44%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $8k · revenue +125%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2019–2021 · $6k · revenue +126%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $6k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • SA
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION OF COLLIER COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -48%
  • HL
    H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
5
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health
6
Stc Healthcare Partners Llc

Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…

Health
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of Collin County Inc

The mission of children's advocacy center of collin county is to provide safety, healing, and justice to children victimized by abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
8
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
9
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
10
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
11
Edward W Sparrow Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate care to everyone, every time.

Health
12
Mcleod Health

To operate a health care system providing medical excellence to the eastern region of south carolina and the extreme southeastern region of north carolina.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Don Moyer Boys & Girls Club; the most unlike its peers is Holmes Christmas Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $55,102 · OtherNORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCHStephens Family YMCA: $20,000 · OtherStephens Family YMCA+10 more: $27,100 · Other+10 moreHEARTLAND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureHEARTLAND MUS…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthST JUDE C…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $6,000 · HealthSHRINERS …SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION OF COLLIER COUNTY: $1,000 · HealthSUBSTANCE…Holmes Christmas Club: $12,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $6,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentDON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$102,202Arts & Culture$20,000Health$15,000Human Services$12,000Philanthropy$9,000Youth Development$7,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEARTLAND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetHolmes Christmas Club: $12,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION OF COLLIER COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEARTLAND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Holmes Christmas Club ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF COLLIER AND THE KEYS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION OF COLLIER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wise Family Foundation Wise Family FoundationFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wise Family Foundation Wise Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oxford Charity and Adoption’s filings →

More from the funding graph