Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Wise Family Foundation Wise Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$344k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of Wise Family Foundation Wise Family Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $245k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Iowa State University$144,839
Oxford Adoption Foundation$100,000
Mayo Clinic Foundation$45,000
Parkland College Foundation$14,755
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,204
St Jude Childrens Hospital$5,000
Heartland Museum Foundation$5,000
Shriners Hospitals for Children$5,000
Samatritans Purse$2,000
United Way$2,000
Naples Retreat$1,000
Habitant For Humanity-Collier Count$1,000
YSS$1,000
Moffitt Cancer Center Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Holmes Christmas Club: $3k → 11%Naples Retreat: $1k → 10%Naples Retreat: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
IA
IN
OH
NE
MO
TN
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 29 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$1.7M
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-19%

Still filing today

45%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $118k · revenue +93%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $30k · revenue +57%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • AA
    Ancient and Accepted Free Masons
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • NN
    NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

2
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
3
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
4
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Children's Hospital & Medical Center Foundation

Children's nebraska foundation (the foundation) was created in 1981 to raise awareness and manage and distribute funds to support children's hospital & medical center's (the hospital) premier pediatric services and programs. as an advocate…

Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Christ's Hospital
8
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
9
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

10
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Dominican Hospital Foundation

The mission of the dominican hospital foundation is to ensure that philanthropic resources are available to respond to and support the changing health care needs of the people within the area served by dignity health dba dominican…

Health
12
Harrison Medical Center Foundation

Harrison medical center foundation is a not-for-profit organization that raises and manages charitable gifts for the benefit of harrison medical center. as a friend of the hospital, the foundation's purpose is to make a positive difference…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children and the most unlike its peers is Naples Retreat Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Iowa State University — $724,339 · OtherIowa State UniversityMayo Clinic Foundation — $235,000 · OtherMayo Clinic FoundationYSS — $103,000 · OtherYSSAncient and Accepted Free Masons — $50,000 · Other+32 more — $180,422 · Other+32 moreOxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc — $350,000 · PhilanthropyOxford Charity and Ad…PARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $118,040 · EducationPARKLAND …UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…USS IOWA (SSN-797) COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE — $10,000 · EducationUSS IOWA …+1 more — $5,000 · EducationSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $22,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20,000 · HealthHEARTLAND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $16,400 · Arts & CultureFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentDON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,000 · Religion
Other$1,292,761Philanthropy$350,000Education$163,040Health$42,000Arts & Culture$16,400Youth Development$10,000Religion$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc — $350,000 over 2y, 90% of budgetPARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $118,040 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $16,400 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetUSS IOWA (SSN-797) COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE — $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY — $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNaples Retreat Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc
  • Who funds PARKLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds HEARTLAND MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds USS IOWA (SSN-797) COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation
  • Who funds Holmes Christmas Club
  • Who funds Naples Retreat Inc
  • Who funds DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation IncFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oxford Charity and Adoption Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wise Family Foundation Wise Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Wise Family Foundation Wise Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Wise Family Foundation Wise Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph