· Public charity
Bellevue Rotary Foundation
To promote community service and social welfare.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $64,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $120,201 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,751 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER | $9,950 |
| THE SOPHIA WAY | $5,800 |
| ACRES OF DIAMONDS | $5,000 |
| KIDVANTAGE | $5,000 |
| PORCHLIGHT INC | $5,000 |
| SEATTLE HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| KINDERING CENTER | $5,000 |
| KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BACKPACK BRIGADE | $4,500 |
| THEATER33 | $3,000 |
| UKRANIAN SCHOOL VYRIY | $3,000 |
| BELLEVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $3,000 |
| BELLEVUE FIRE FOUNDATION | $2,700 |
| ATWORK | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $15k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CENTER FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SOPHIA WAY3× · 2021–2025 · $36k · revenue +3%
- BMBackpack Meals for Kids3× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +321%
- AOAcres of Diamonds2× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- YEYouth Eastside Servicesgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +80%
- TBTHE BELLEVUE POLICE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue +267%
- FOFRIENDS OF YOUTHone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bike Works promotes the bicycle as a vehicle for change to empower youth and build resilient communities.
Futurewise works throughout Washington state to encourage healthy, equitable and opportunity-rich communities, and to protect our most valuable farmlands, forests and water resources through wise land use policies and practices.
RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.
West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.
We Heart Seattle is an action-based, boots-on-the-ground movement that organizes trash cleanups in our public spaces and offers resources to those in need. Through our direct civic engagement we lead the way to a more compassionate and…
House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…
Equip the public and public decision-makers with the policy research and practical tools they need to embed the values of fairness, care, and opportunity into the foundations of Washington's economy.
Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities
Washington Bikes works to ensure that all who ride a bicycle in Washington have safe comfortable and convenient places to ride. Organization advocates for bicyclists rights and shapes policies.
Eastside Legal Assistance Program (ELAP) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the legal system more accessible to those most in need by providing free or low-cost yet high quality civil legal services to low-income residents of…
Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Overlake Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ukrainian Cultural Center Toloka. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds HARVEST AGAINST HUNGER ↗
- Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY ↗
- Who funds Backpack Meals for Kids ↗
- Who funds Acres of Diamonds ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
- Who funds THE BELLEVUE POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jubilee REACH ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds King County Library System Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Big Table ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
- Who funds ROTACARE INTERNATIONAL INC PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds THEATRE33 ↗
- Who funds NAMI Eastside ↗
- Who funds SPLASHFORWARD ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds KIDVANTAGE ↗
- Who funds PORCHLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds ISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK ↗
- Who funds LAKE WASHINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds Wisecamps ↗
- Who funds NO MORE UNDER ↗
- Who funds BACKPACK BRIGADE ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Cultural Center Toloka ↗
- Who funds Bellevue Sunrise Rotary Foundation ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Leadership Eastside A Washington Nonprofit Corporation ↗
- Who funds HELPING OUR MINIATURE EQUINES ↗
- Who funds Bridge Ministries Bridge Disability Ministries ↗
- Who funds RAINIER ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds ATWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Aven Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Byron & Alice Lockwood Foundation · Thurston Charitable Foundation · Ellison Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Kidvantage
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bellevue Rotary Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.