How much did OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER grant in FY2023?

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER reported 15 grants totaling $2,678,500 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER based?

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER is based in WA.

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

The purpose is to operate a hospital for the care of persons, to participate in education, research and other activities designed to promote general health of the community.

$2.7M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$2.4M

Largest

01What you fund

0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Health$13MHuman Services$169kArts & Culture$78kEducation$78kHousing & Shelter$53kPhilanthropy$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kCommunity Improvement$30kOther$430k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

responseleadsemergencieshealthcareissaquahpatientensure

2020

facultybellevuecancerbenefitmental

2021

trainingpre-hospital emergencyissaquahcivicdomestic violencepatientfaculty

2022

case managementfostermary's placewomen childrenshelterfoodtogether

2023

domestic violencetogetherself-sufficiencyhopelinkaccesshealthychange

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k3 grants · $24k
$10k–50k11 grants · $165k
$250k+1 grant · $2.4M

$12,000

Median grant

States reached

$934M

Total assets

Largest grants

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,430,893
HOPELINK$30,000
NAMI EASTSIDE$25,000
LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$15,000
BELLEVUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$15,000
YOUTH EASTSIDE SERVICES$15,000
PLYMOUTH HOUSING GROUP$12,500
GREATER ISSAQUAH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$12,000
THE SOPHIA WAY$10,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
TOGETHER CENTER$10,000
BLOODWORKS$10,000
GREATER KIRKLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$8,100
SEATTLE PRIDE$8,000
LIFEWIRE$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$14M · 23 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$14M

$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+104%

Still filing today

96%

92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OH
Overlake Hospital Foundation
6× · 2018–2023 · $13M · revenue +121%
AH
American Heart Association
5× · 2018–2022 · $115k · revenue +14%
BC
Bellevue Chamber of Commerce
3× · 2018–2022 · $70k · revenue +80%

Funded once

MO
MEDIC ONE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +46%
EC
EASTSIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +176%
CF
CONGREGATION FOR THE HOMELESSgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +118%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

International Community Health Services

Provide health services to improve the health of asian pacific islander and other communities.

Health

Healthpoint

Strengthen communities and improve health by delivering quality service to all.

Health

Community Health Center of

To provide our diverse community with access to high quality, affordable primary health care

Health

North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health

One Community Health

To advance health and social justice for all members of our community.

—

The Humane Society for Seattleking

Animal welfare organization

Animals

Dispute Resolution Center of Grays Harbor and Pacific Counties

To build long-lasting conflict solutions between to people and groups across Grays Harbor and Pacific Counties.

Crime & Legal

King County Sexual Assault Resource

Non-profit organization providing sexual assault related services for people of King County.

—

Washington Association for Community

To strengthen and advocate for washington's community health centers to build healthcare access.

—

Life Science Washington

Stimulating life science innovation, job creation and ecosystem vibrancy across washington state through engagement, collaboration, promotion, and advocacy.

—

West Region Ems & Trama Care

To assist and guide local ems and trauma care providers in the coordination and improvement of emergancy medical services in the washington state department of healths west region.

—

Washington Bikes

The organization advocates for the rights of people who ride bikes and holds officials accountable working with them to shape policies.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Plymouth Housing Group and Subsidiaries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/40

the rest of the field

12%

1,487/12,699

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/39

Grantees still filing

29/39

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$13,185,908Other$500,399Human Services$168,500Arts & Culture$78,000Education$78,000Housing & Shelter$52,500Philanthropy$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE47.4× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Swedish Health Services · Bellevue Rotary Foundation · Aven Foundation · Thurston Charitable Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Charis Fund · Lucky Seven Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Overlake Hospital Auxiliaries.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 237297831 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Overlake Hospital Auxiliaries, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 88% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Overlake Hospital Medical Center?

Find your warmest path to Overlake Hospital Medical Center through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Overlake Hospital Medical Center?

More from the funding graph

OVERLAKE HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Overlake Hospital Medical Center?

More from the funding graph