Skip to content

· Public charity

Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach

Our mission is to serve, empower and transform children and young adults by providing basic needs, camps, youth development, leadership training, mission trips and life-changing experiences.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$205kHealth$93kYouth Development$84kEducation$67kFood & Nutrition$44kRecreation & Sports$33kHuman Services$25kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,505, the rows itemized in this filing. The $68,775 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $61,270 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,505
Median grant
1
States reached
$114k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION OF HOPE$7,505
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SUPPORTING ADOPTION & FOSTER FAMILIES TOGETHER INC (SAFFT): $5k → 14%ELS FOR AUSTISM: $24k → 11%NORTH EAST WAKE BACKPACK BUDDIES: $10k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DURHAM: $5k → 11%KELL TOUCHDOWN CLUB: $12k → 8%ADVOCATES FOR BARTOW'S CHILDREN INC: $5k → 10%EAST LAKE GOLF FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%YOUNG LIFE BAHAMAS: $19k → 9%KIDS AROUND THE WORLD: $28k → 15%NEW HORIZONS OF NORTH TEXAS: $5k → 14%ELS FOR AUTISM: $12k → 11%NORTH EAST WAKE BACKPACK BUDDIES: $7k → 8%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF DURHAM: $5k → 11%KELL TOUCHDOWN CLUB: $11k → 8%KIDS AROUND THE WORLD: $24k → 15%MAKE A WISH EASTERN NC: $8k → 8%KELL TOUCHDOWN CLUB: $10k → 8%MAKE A WISH EASTERN NC: $8k → 8%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 8%TAMMY LYNN CENTER: $10k → 8%TAMMY LYNN CENTER: $5k → 8%WE CARE WSMGA: $10k → 8%TAMMY LYNN CENTER: $5k → 8%WE CARE WSMGA: $6k → 8%THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $10k → 8%THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $8k → 8%FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $8k → 8%THE FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $6k → 8%THE FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $5k → 8%THE FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $5k → 8%THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $5k → 8%LUCY DANIELS CENTER: $18k → 8%LUCY DANIELS CENTER: $18k → 8%LUCY DANIELS CENTER: $15k → 8%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - OCCONEECHEE COUNCIL: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $56k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$56k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: FUNDING FOR 100,000 MEALS SENT TO NICARAGUA TO IMPACT THE LIVES OF KIDS AND THEIR SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES WITH GOD'S TRANSFORMING HOPE THROUGH FOOD, PLAY, AND STORY · FUNDING FOR YOUTH CAMPS AND LEADERSHIP TRAINING IN NASSAU AND ELEUTHERA, BAHAMAS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreachlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$449k · 11 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$449k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+16%

Still filing today

73%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $36k · revenue +109%
  • FOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS
    4× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +135%
  • TG
    TRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • KA
    KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $52k · revenue +25%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +18%
  • SP
    SOCIEDAD PRO HOSPITAL DEL NINO
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crossnore Communities for Children

Crossnore communities for children champions the well being of children and families by fostering innovative change that weaves a fabric of resilience in homes, schools, and communities.

Health
2
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
3
Baptist Children's Homes of North Carolina Incorporated

Baptist children's homes of north carolina (bch) is a nonprofit organization that reaches out to children and families in crisis. the agency's mission statement is "sharing hope...changing lives."

Religion
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the Carolinas Inc

It is the mission of the ronald mcdonald house charities of the carolinas, inc. to provide for the physical and emotional well being of children and their families.

—
5
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
6
North Carolina Youth Soccer Association Inc

Promote, coordinate, and develop youth soccer.

Recreation & Sports
7
North Carolina Foundation for Public School Children

To provide basic necessities for public school children as well as improving parenting skills in order for the children to be successful in school and to expand professional development opportunities for educators.

Philanthropy
8
Raise a Child Carolinas

Raise a Child Carolinas' mission is to empower youth through hands-on STEAM learning in afterschool and seasonal camps that ignite curiosity, build confidence, and introduce real-world careers they can imagine themselves in.

Education
9
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
10
North Carolina Association for the Education of Young Children

Ncaeyc promotes high-quality early learning for all children, birth through age 8, by connecting practice, policy, and research. we advance a diverse, dynamic early childhood profession and support all who care for, educate, and work on…

—
11
Children's Harbor Inc

Children's harbor provides refuge, respite and resources to families with children who have experienced a life-altering medical diagnosis. the families and caregivers we serve seek a safe refuge when faced with unexpected life…

Health
12
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc

Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Eastern North Carolina; the most unlike its peers is Nhntx Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN BELARUSSIAN RELIEF ORGANIZATION: $204,500 · OtherAMERICAN BELARUSSIAN RELIEF ORGANIZATIONKELL TOUCHDOWN CLUB: $33,040 · OtherKELL TOUCHDOWN CLUBFOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS: $23,765 · OtherFOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESSTAMMY LYNN CENTER INC: $20,000 · OtherTAMMY LYNN CENTER INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $27,975 · Other+4 moreKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $51,798 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS AROUND THE…YOUNG LIFE: $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFELoaves and Fishes Ministry Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentLoaves and Fish…LUCY DANIELS CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD: $51,128 · EducationLUCY DANIE…ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $35,652 · HealthSOCIEDAD PRO HOSPITAL DEL NINO: $8,000 · HealthTRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $23,000 · Recreation & SportsWE CARE WSMGA: $16,000 · PhilanthropyEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNorth East Wake Backpack Buddies: $16,500 · Food & NutritionNHNTX INC: $5,000 · Religion
Other$324,280Youth Development$75,798Education$51,128Health$43,652Recreation & Sports$23,000Philanthropy$21,000Food & Nutrition$16,500Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN BELARUSSIAN RELIEF ORGANIZATION: $204,500 over 3y, 22% of budgetKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC: $51,798 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLUCY DANIELS CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD: $51,128 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $35,652 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS: $23,765 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $23,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $19,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth East Wake Backpack Buddies: $16,500 over 2y, 17% of budgetWE CARE WSMGA: $16,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE: $10,475 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOCCONEECHEE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #421: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNHNTX INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetEAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Carolina Hurricanes Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · John William Pope Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Edward Jones Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach’s filings →

    More from the funding graph