· Public charity
Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach
Our mission is to serve, empower and transform children and young adults by providing basic needs, camps, youth development, leadership training, mission trips and life-changing experiences.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of OVERFLOWING HANDS INC BELARUSSIAN OUTREACH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $7,505 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $68,775 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $61,270 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION OF HOPE | $7,505 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $56k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: FUNDING FOR 100,000 MEALS SENT TO NICARAGUA TO IMPACT THE LIVES OF KIDS AND THEIR SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES WITH GOD'S TRANSFORMING HOPE THROUGH FOOD, PLAY, AND STORY · FUNDING FOR YOUTH CAMPS AND LEADERSHIP TRAINING IN NASSAU AND ELEUTHERA, BAHAMAS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 22% of Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EFELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $36k · revenue +109%
FOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS4× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +135%- TGTRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE3× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- KAKIDS AROUND THE WORLD INCone grant, 2022 · $52k · revenue +25%
- YLYOUNG LIFEone grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue +18%
- SPSOCIEDAD PRO HOSPITAL DEL NINOone grant, 2018 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Baptist children's homes of north carolina (bch) is a nonprofit organization that reaches out to children and families in crisis. the agency's mission statement is "sharing hope...changing lives."
It is the mission of the ronald mcdonald house charities of the carolinas, inc. to provide for the physical and emotional well being of children and their families.
The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.
To strengthen families, organizations, and communities to prevent child abuse and neglect.
To transform lives and communities by providing an array of programs, all directed toward changing the lives of children in the foster care system aimed to prevent academic failure, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, sex trafficking,…
Promote, coordinate, and develop youth soccer.
To provide basic necessities for public school children as well as improving parenting skills in order for the children to be successful in school and to expand professional development opportunities for educators.
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Children's harbor provides refuge, respite and resources to families with children who have experienced a life-altering medical diagnosis. the families and caregivers we serve seek a safe refuge when faced with unexpected life…
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, toreach their full potential as productive, caring, responsiblecitizens.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Eastern North Carolina and the most unlike its peers is Nhntx Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN BELARUSSIAN RELIEF ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS AROUND THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds LUCY DANIELS CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD ↗
- Who funds ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
- Who funds TAMMY LYNN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds North East Wake Backpack Buddies ↗
- Who funds WE CARE WSMGA ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
- Who funds SOCIEDAD PRO HOSPITAL DEL NINO ↗
- Who funds OCCONEECHEE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA #421 ↗
- Who funds Loaves and Fishes Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds EAST LAKE FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NHNTX INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Carolina Hurricanes Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · John William Pope Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Edward Jones Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Overflowing Hands Inc Belarussian Outreach funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.