Skip to content
Otto Schoitz Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Otto Schoitz Foundation

Improve the health and well-being of the community and its individual members within the greater cedar valley region, defined as the geographical area within 30 miles from the center of waterloo, iowa.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$4.9MHuman Services$3.7MCommunity Improvement$3.4MEducation$2.8MHealth$2.4MYouth Development$2.0MPublic Benefit$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $631k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $724k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$74M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK$800,000
WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$500,000
IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$365,000
CITY OF WATERLOOLEISURE SERVICES$333,334
CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DBA HOUSE OF HOPE$325,000
CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$150,000
SUCCESSLINK$90,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY$75,000
CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY$75,000
GRIN AND GROW LTD DBA GROWING MINDS EARLY LEARNING CENTER$63,750
IOWA LEGAL AID$62,500
ONE CEDAR VALLEY$57,500
THE SALVATION ARMY OF WATERLOOCEDAR FALLS$50,000
JESSE COSBY CENTER$50,000
YWCA OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $8k → 8%ETHNIC MINORITIES OF BURMA ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $66k → 10%SUCCESSLINK: $55k → 7%WAYPOINT: $8k → 9%ETHNIC MINORITIES OF BURMA ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 10%THE LARRABEE CENTER: $20k → 7%THE LARRABEE CENTER INC: $15k → 7%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $18k → 10%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $10k → 10%JESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $185k → 17%SUCCESSLINK: $73k → 17%SOCIAL ACTION INC: $53k → 17%JESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $45k → 17%SOCIAL ACTION INC: $22k → 17%SUCCESSLINK: $20k → 17%SOCIAL ACTION INC: $17k → 17%FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $8k → 17%FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $3k → 17%SUCCESSLINK: $237k → 17%SUCCESSLINK: $90k → 17%SUCCESSLINK: $75k → 17%SUCCESSLINK: $75k → 17%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $35k → 17%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $27k → 17%CEDAR VALLEY ANGELS: $45k → 17%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $12k → 17%LOVE INC OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $19k → 17%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $10k → 17%LOVE INC OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $14k → 17%LOVE INC OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $12k → 17%LOVE INC OF CEDAR VALLEY: $10k → 17%LOVE INC OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $3k → 17%EMBARC ETHNIC MINORITIES OF BURMA ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $182k → 17%FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $150k → 17%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $50k → 17%AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICES: $38k → 17%ETHNIC MINORITIES OF BURMA ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $31k → 17%ETHNIC MINORITIES OF BURMA ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 17%NORTHEAST IOWA AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $23k → 17%THE RIVER ARC: $23k → 17%ETHNIC MINORITIES OF BURMA ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 17%NORTHEAST IOWA AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22M · 76 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
28

Total granted

$22M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+7%

Still filing today

71%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $611k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +292% · 55% of their budget
  • CV
    CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +83%
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    7× · 2018–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +109% · 61% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF WATERLOO - WATERLOO LEISURE SERVICES
    one grant, 2019 · $331k
  • CO
    CITY OF WATERLOOWATERLOO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $310k
  • FV
    FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +215%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
2
West Central Community Action

In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
3
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
4
South Central Iowa Community Action Program Inc

To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…

Community Improvement
5
Iowa Center for Children's Justice

ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.

Civil Rights
6
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
7
Community Action of Eastern Iowa

Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.

Community Improvement
8
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
9
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
10
Webster City Day Care

Child day care center

—
11
Iowa Chapter of Children's Advocacy Centers

To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.

Crime & Legal
12
Community Foundation for Western Iowa

The community foundation for western iowa is dedicated to creating a lasting legacy in our region by engaging our citizens and communities for durable change and fostering a culture of philanthropy. this is where giving grows.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Four Oaks Family and Children's Services; the most unlike its peers is Black Hawk County 4H & Ffa Foundati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/76
Grantees still filing
48/76
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC: $2,029,794 · OtherCEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INCCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $1,832,779 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCITY OF WATERLOOLEISURE SERVICES: $1,000,000 · OtherCITY OF WATERLOOLEISURE SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $650,000 · OtherCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $490,735 · OtherWATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $500,000 · Other+68 more: $5,910,156 · Other+68 moreIOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,568,266 · Housing & ShelterIOWA HEARTLAN…WATERLOO HOUSING TRUST FUND: $186,600 · Housing & ShelterWATERLOO HOUS…AMERICANS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $132,164 · Housing & ShelterHAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN: $675,000 · EducationHAWKEYE COMM…GRIN & GROW LTD: $618,750 · EducationGRIN & GROW …WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $501,000 · EducationWATERLOO COM…UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $212,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…JOB FOUNDATION: $209,318 · EducationJOB FOUNDATI…CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $155,625 · EducationCEDAR FALLS …Riverview Center Inc: $148,604 · EducationRiverview Ce…ROYAL LEGACY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $106,250 · Education+4 more: $71,929 · EducationSUCCESSLINK INC: $625,000 · Human ServicesSUCCESSLINK…CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $410,000 · Human ServicesCEDAR VALLE…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION: $348,343 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & I…JESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $230,000 · Human ServicesJESSE COSBY…FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $150,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP …AMANI COMMUNITY SERVICE: $122,750 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC: $111,250 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ACTION INC: $92,187 · Human Services+9 more: $297,648 · Human Services+9 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $1,150,000 · Youth DevelopmentIOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC: $135,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRY PIE: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentINCLUSION CONNECTION INC: $82,178 · Youth Development+3 more: $35,100 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK: $1,150,000 · Food & NutritionPEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $1,005,000 · HealthVISION TO LEARN: $105,000 · Health+1 more: $22,500 · Health
Other$12,413,464Housing & Shelter$2,887,030Education$2,698,976Human Services$2,387,178Youth Development$1,502,278Food & Nutrition$1,150,000Health$1,132,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $2,568,266 over 7y, 55% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC: $2,029,794 over 6y, 17% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $1,832,779 over 7y, 61% of budgetNORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK: $1,150,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $1,150,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetPEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $1,005,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN: $675,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetSUCCESSLINK INC: $625,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetGRIN & GROW LTD: $618,750 over 8y, 28% of budgetWATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $501,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $490,735 over 3y, 22% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC: $410,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION: $348,343 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetIowa Legal Aid: $325,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION: $281,000 over 6y, 35% of budgetOPERATION THRESHOLD INC: $239,188 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetJESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $230,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetONE CITY UNITED: $228,750 over 6y, 18% of budgetTHE FAMILY YMCA OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY: $221,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $212,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetJOB FOUNDATION: $209,318 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Dubuque: $195,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetTRI-COUNTY CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $194,650 over 4y, 1.2% of budget1619 FREEDOM SCHOOL: $189,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetNORTH STAR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $188,233 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetWATERLOO HOUSING TRUST FUND: $186,600 over 7y, 20% of budgetYWCA BLACK HAWK COUNTY: $175,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetCEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $155,625 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetYouth Art Team: $150,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetRiverview Center Inc: $148,604 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetIOWA JOBS FOR AMERICA'S GRADUATES INC: $135,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICANS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $132,164 over 6y, 12% of budgetONE CEDAR VALLEY: $125,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetFAMILY & CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY: $124,140 over 4y, 11% of budgetAMANI COMMUNITY SERVICE: $122,750 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL PERSONS INC: $111,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROYAL LEGACY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $106,250 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $105,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRY PIE: $100,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetGROUT MUSEUM INC: $86,250 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetNORTH END CULTURAL CENTER INC: $85,120 over 4y, 25% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA AND WESTERN ILLINOIS INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetINCLUSION CONNECTION INC: $82,178 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $76,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST IOWA: $72,400 over 2y, 13% of budgetLOVE INC OF THE CEDAR VALLEY: $57,298 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetCEDAR VALLEY TRAILS PARTNERSHIP: $55,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHEAST IOWA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IOWA HEARTLAND HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST IOWA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CEDAR VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HAWKEYE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FDN ↗
  • Who funds SUCCESSLINK INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIN & GROW LTD ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR VALLEY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT VOICES IN ACTION ↗
  • Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
  • Who funds LEADER VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION THRESHOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds JESSE COSBY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE CITY UNITED ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY YMCA OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Dubuque ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds 1619 FREEDOM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERLOO HOUSING TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds YWCA BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR FALLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Youth Art Team ↗
  • Who funds Riverview Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Max and Helen Guernse…Black Hawk County Gam…Lsb FoundationCedar Valley United W…R J McElroy TrustDupaco RW Hoefer Foun…Van G Miller Family C…Trustage Foundation I…Duroe Family Foundati…The Gallagher Family …The Accel FoundationGreenState Credit Uni…
Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable FoundationIA116.8× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Max and Helen Guernsey Charitable Foundation · Black Hawk County Gaming Association · Lsb Foundation · Cedar Valley United Way · R J McElroy Trust · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · Van G Miller Family Charitable Foundation · Trustage Foundation Inc · Duroe Family Foundation · The Gallagher Family Foundation · The Accel Foundation · GreenState Credit Union

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Otto Schoitz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Otto Schoitz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Otto Schoitz’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home