Skip to content

· Private foundation

Oster Sinisi Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.0MInternational$308kHuman Services$283kReligion$85kYouth Development$74kCivil Rights$67kPhilanthropy$35kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
$29,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC$30,000
MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE$29,500
CROSSTALK OFFICIAL FOUNDATION$20,000
TEMPLE SINAI$7,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE BLUE CARD: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
DE
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of Oster Sinisi Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Oster Sinisi Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 15 repeat orgs$587k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
44

Total granted

$2.4M
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+27%

Still filing today

33%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +9%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $226k · revenue +274%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $185k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $72k
  • DG
    DOG GREEN PRODUCTIONS FIDDLER
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
The Foundation for the Preservation of the History of the Jewish People in
Arts & Culture
5
Novachai
Education
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Yad Laniyim
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
12
Yakar Foundation Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Society for Yad Vashem Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wordtheatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $1,449,300 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUSTFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $226,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC+7 more: $83,820 · Arts & CultureJEWISH HOME FOUNDATION: $161,500 · OtherJEWISH HOME FOUNDATIONA CARING HAND: $116,500 · OtherA CARING HANDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL: $75,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAELIndividual grant recipient: $72,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientA HOLE-IN-THE-WALL CAMP FUND: $70,000 · OtherA HOLE-IN-THE-WALL CAMP FUNDGEDENK MOVEMENT INC: $66,800 · OtherGEDENK MOVEMENT INCWORLD THEATRE: $51,000 · OtherDOG GREEN PRODUCTIONS FIDDLER: $50,000 · OtherVINEYARD THEATRE: $38,200 · Other+36 more: $261,030 · Other+36 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $184,500 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $25,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $25,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyHONOR 37: $22,500 · Crime & LegalALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · HealthBEYOND TYPE 1: $6,500 · HealthUPSTART BAY AREA: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$1,759,120Other$962,030International$234,500Philanthropy$30,000Crime & Legal$22,500Health$16,500Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $1,449,300 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $226,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $184,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGEDENK MOVEMENT INC: $66,800 over 2y, 79% of budgetFILM FORUM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHONOR 37: $22,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetWORDTHEATRE: $20,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPSTART BAY AREA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEYOND TYPE 1: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOLKSBIENE YIDDISH THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIANS INC: $3,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVINEYARD THEATRE AND WORKSHOP CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Partisan Education Foundation: $600 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds GEDENK MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HAGAL SHELI INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HONOR 37 ↗
  • Who funds WORDTHEATRE ↗
  • Who funds TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPSTART BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND TYPE 1 ↗
  • Who funds FOLKSBIENE YIDDISH THEATRE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oster Sinisi Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oster Sinisi Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Torah Academy of Bergen County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oster Sinisi Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oster Sinisi Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oster Sinisi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph