· Private foundation
Osceola Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $163,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $209,750 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $107k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Nantucket Historical Association | $30,000 |
| Nantucket Community Music Center | $27,375 |
| Nantucket Cottage Hospital | $15,000 |
| Nantucket Land & Water Council, Inc. | $15,000 |
| Brain Aneurysm Foundation | $10,000 |
| New School University | $10,000 |
| Hawaii Community Foundation | $7,000 |
| Proctor Academy | $6,000 |
| Nantucket Preservation Trust | $5,000 |
| Nantucket Sustainable Development Corp. | $4,500 |
| Upper Arlington Community Foundation | $3,375 |
| Artist Association of Nantucket | $3,000 |
| Sant Bani School | $3,000 |
| A Kid Again | $3,000 |
| Maria Mitchell Association | $2,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN3× · 2022–2024 · $81k · revenue +53%
- TNThe New School4× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +24%
- NCNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER3× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- TFThe Friends of NPS National Center for Preservation Technology and Trainingone grant, 2022 · $30k
- MEMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUSTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +119%
- CMCOLUMBIA MUSEUM OF ARTone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.
To preserve the character of the village of 'sconset by conserving open land, preserving historically and/or architecturally significant structures and fostering a healthy commercial center in keeping with 'sconset's character.
To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To inspire appreciation, understanding and stewardship of our natural environment through discovery and learning.
New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
The alliance to protect nantucket sound is a 501(c)(3) non-profit environmental organization dedicated to the permanent preservation of nantucket sound, the historic body of water that lies between cape cod, martha's vineyard, and…
Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…
Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cape Ann Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Albert F Egan Jr & Dorothy H Egan F. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN ↗
- Who funds The New School ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRAIN ANEURYSM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds SANT BANI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds A KID AGAIN INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE ALBERT F EGAN JR & DOROTHY H EGAN F ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
- Who funds GREEN MOUNTAIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ACKNOW COMMUNITY INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · The George & Marie Chabot Charitable Foundation · Gilbert Verney Foundation · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · The Hale Family Foundation · Clara Foundation Inc · Peravid Foundation Agency · Karp Family Foundation Stephen R and Jill E Karp Trustees
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Osceola Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Osceola Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.