· Private foundation
Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k68 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $419k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES | $120,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $84,250 |
| PINGRY CORPORATION | $65,000 |
| FREEDOM HOUSE | $50,000 |
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| MAYO PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $50,000 |
| LASELL UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $12,000 |
| SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| CONNECTICUT COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC | $8,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY | $7,000 |
| NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
84 repeat relationships — 68 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES5× · 2021–2025 · $544k · revenue +71%- NHNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION3× · 2020–2022 · $300k · revenue +180%
- TPTHE PINGRY CORPORATION5× · 2020–2025 · $290k · revenue +40%
Funded once
USTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +29%- CICHRISTMAS IS FOR CHILDREN INCone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -70%
- CDCANTON DAY CARE CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the new canaan land trust is to foster a connection between the new canaan community and its natural resources through the conservation and sustainable stewardship of our open space.
Northern neck land conservancy's mission is to preserve the rural heritage of the northern neck and essex county by conserving their lands, water, economies and culture for future generations. the land conservancy assists landowners who…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…
Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.
Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
To preserve and steward aquidneck island's open spaces for the lasting benefit of the community while connecting people with the land that defines the island's natural character.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nantucket Community Sailing Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Albert F Egan Jr & Dorothy H Egan F. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE PINGRY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LASELL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BLINKNOW FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT ↗
- Who funds SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GENEVA INC ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE NANTUCKET INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds COLLABORATIVE SUPPORT PROGRAMS OF NJ ↗
- Who funds SMITH CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds KIWIMBI INTERNATIONALA NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET PRESERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKSIDE ENGINE CO NO 1 ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds 'SCONSET TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds New Jersey Audubon Society ↗
- Who funds MENDHAM TOWNSHIP LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds MENDHAM TOWNSHIP FIRST AID SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds New Eyes for the Needy Inc ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET SHELLFISH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds JERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · The George & Marie Chabot Charitable Foundation · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Elizabeth Thayer & E Geoffrey Verney Foundation · The Hale Family Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Clara Foundation Inc · Gilbert Verney Foundation · Fm Kirby Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Jersey Tree Foundation — 100% of income from government
- Collaborative Support Programs of Nj — 93% of income from government
- Community in Crisis Inc — 56% of income from government
- Vermont Land Trust Inc — 42% of income from government
- Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc — 40% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Eva's Village Inc — 19% of income from government
- The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis — 17% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
- Homeless Solutions Inc — 6% of income from government
- Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Montshire Museum of Science Inc — 4% of income from government
- Lasell University — 4% of income from government
- Freedom House Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cornerstone Family Programs — 3% of income from government
- Family Promise Inc — 2% of income from government
- Nantucket Community Music Center — 1% of income from government
- Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- New Jersey Audubon Society — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
- Vermont Institute of Natural Science Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Carverdelaney Families Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.