Skip to content
Orosz Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Orosz Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$761k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$2.7MEducation$708kArts & Culture$254kHealth$107kRecreation & Sports$98kPublic Benefit$75kSocial Science$30kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $420k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$250,000
ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC$200,000
Individual grant recipient$70,000
NAPA INSTITUTE$50,000
CRISTO REY NETWORK$50,000
FOCUS FOUNDATION$50,000
NEWMAN CATHOLIC MINISTRY$25,000
EMMAUS CAMPAIGN$25,000
ORLANDO CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL$23,040
ORLANDO MAGIC YOUTH FOUNDATION$10,363
THE HOPE CHURCH$5,000
ST MARGARET MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $519k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $200k → 13%ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $175k → 13%ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $54k → 13%THE ELEVATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $25k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $5k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $5k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IN
OH
PA
RI
CA
CO
KY
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 14 repeat orgs$639k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
35

Total granted

$3.8M
$574k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+26%

Still filing today

71%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +267%
  • ES
    ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $504k · revenue +78%
  • TN
    THE NAPA INSTITUTE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $250k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • Augustine Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +74%
  • DP
    DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2023 · $69k
  • AF
    AdventHealth Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
2
Ave Maria University Inc

University education grounded in the traditions and faith of the roman catholic church

Education
3
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
4
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
5
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
6
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
7
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
8
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
9
Collegium Institute

Collegium Institute is a Catholic intellectual apostolate that fosters the Catholic intellectual tradition within the University of Pennsylvania community and within the greater region and secular academia. (Continued on Sch. O)

—
10
La Roche University

La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Association of Catholic Colleges and University

The association of catholic colleges and universities, founded in 1899, serves as the collective voice of u.s catholic higher education. through programs and services, the association strengthens and promptes the catholic identity and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ethics and Public Policy Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mountain Air Community Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $1,739,234 · ReligionCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTETHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $250,000 · ReligionTHE NAPA INSTITUTE+1 more: $20,000 · ReligionIndividual grant recipient: $360,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFOCUS EVANGELIZATION FOUNDATION: $350,000 · OtherFOCUS EVANGELIZATION FOUNDATIONEMMAUS CAMPAIGN: $101,302 · OtherEMMAUS CAMPAIGNDR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $68,813 · OtherFLORIDA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTHE ELEVATION SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+36 more: $389,666 · Other+36 moreELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $504,000 · Human ServicesELEVATION SCH…+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesAugustine Institute Inc: $100,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NETWORK: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $98,100 · EducationCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF ORLANDO INC: $11,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationDR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $180,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC: $75,000 · Public BenefitAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $50,000 · Health
Religion$2,009,234Other$1,369,781Human Services$519,000Education$311,600Arts & Culture$180,500Public Benefit$75,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $1,739,234 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetELEVATION SCHOLARS INC: $504,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $250,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetDR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $180,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $98,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAdventHealth Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFrontline Outreach Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Becket Fund: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Catholic Foundation of Central Florida Inc: $18,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF ORLANDO INC: $11,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetORLANDO MAGIC YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $10,363 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNO BARRIERS USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATTS OF LOVE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERTS FOR HOPE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetADULT LITERACY LEAGUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMountain Air Community Fund Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATION SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NAPA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DR PHILLIPS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AdventHealth Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Frontline Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Becket Fund ↗
  • Who funds ST PAUL CENTER FOR BIBLICAL THEOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds The Catholic Foundation of Central Florida Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO MAGIC YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NO BARRIERS USA ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATTS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable F…Kiwanis Club of Orlan…James P Caruso & Chri…Knights of Columbus C…University of Notre D…Truist Foundation IncPublix Super Markets …Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…The US Charitable Gif…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY15.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Kiwanis Club of Orlando Foundation Inc · James P Caruso & Christine S Caruso Charitable Fund Inc · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Truist Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Orosz Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Orosz Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Dr Phillips Center for the Performing Arts Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Orosz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home