Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ornest Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$394k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$798kEducation$542kHuman Services$440kPhilanthropy$416kArts & Culture$351kReligion$194kRecreation & Sports$118kCivil Rights$103kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $315k
$6,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$45,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
UCSB$26,000
BEVERLY HILLS ATHLETIC ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$25,000
FRIENDS OF VANCOUVER FOUNDATION$20,000
HILLEL$18,000
CHEWONKI FOUNDATION$14,000
SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION$11,500
THE FOUNDATION FOR ART & HEALING$10,500
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$10,000
SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $164k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VISTA DEL MAR: $30k → 14%SENTINEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%VISTA DEL MAR: $25k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $14k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $10k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $10k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $500 → 14%WELLS BRING HOPE: $500 → 14%HANDS 4 HOPE LA: $500 → 14%MEND: $3k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 81 repeat orgs$288k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

81 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
52

Total granted

$3.0M
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+3%

Still filing today

56%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $204k · revenue +81%
  • VD
    VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $119k · revenue +19%
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $84k · revenue +432%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • WF
    WOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • PC
    PIERCE COLLEGE BASEBALL DUGOUT CLUB INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
2
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
4
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
5
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
6
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
7
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Beyond Differences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 152 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/91
Grantees still filing
58/91
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION: $347,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONIndividual grant recipient: $306,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $240,200 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESACLU FOUNDATION: $91,500 · OtherCHAMPS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherJVSLA: $75,000 · Other+88 more: $886,641 · Other+88 moreINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATION…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $56,000 · Arts & CultureThe United …AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $41,800 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SO…LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES…+13 more: $67,700 · Arts & Culture+13 moreBRIDGES ACADEMY INC: $75,000 · EducationBRIDGES AC…UCLA FOUNDATION: $64,000 · EducationUCLA FOUND…AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $36,500 · EducationAMERICANS …WINDWARD SCHOOL: $36,120 · EducationWINDWARD S…WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $34,000 · EducationWORKING AM…+9 more: $59,000 · Education+9 moreDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $204,450 · HealthDIDI HIRSC…CASA COLINA INC: $70,000 · HealthCASA COLIN…SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $11,500 · Health+6 more: $14,300 · HealthVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $119,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSentinel Foundation: $10,000 · Human Services+6 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesBEVERLY HILLS ATHLETIC ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsPalisades Baseball Team Inc: $16,900 · Recreation & SportsWATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports+3 more: $2,075 · Recreation & SportsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $84,000 · Civil RightsACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $4,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$2,036,841Arts & Culture$335,500Education$304,620Health$300,250Human Services$165,000Recreation & Sports$97,475Civil Rights$88,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $204,450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $119,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $84,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES ACADEMY INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBEVERLY HILLS ATHLETIC ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetCASA COLINA INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $56,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $41,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $37,200 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $36,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWINDWARD SCHOOL: $36,120 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND: $34,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AURELIA FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetBeyond Differences: $32,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChewonki Foundation Inc: $27,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $24,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF VANCOUVER FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPalisades Baseball Team Inc: $16,900 over 2y, 21% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR ART & HEALING INC: $10,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWholeSchool Mindfulness Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetElon University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSTOCK FILM FESTIVAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIndependent Arts & Media: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHelen Keller Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetSentinel Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLEARNING WITH A DIFFERENCE INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKITTY BUNGALOW CHARM SCHOOL FOR WAYWARD CATS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH WOMEN'S THEATRE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA THEATER MATTERS: $4,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConnecting to Cure Crohn's and Colitis Inc: $3,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY HILLS ATHLETIC ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA COLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDWARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WORKING AMERICA EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE AURELIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Beyond Differences ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Chewonki Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF VANCOUVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Palisades Baseball Team Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA34.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Milton and Ruth Berman Family Foundation · The Michael and Lori Milken Family Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · Onion Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ornest Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ornest Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ornest Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ornest Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 152 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ornest Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph