Skip to content

· Private foundation

Orna & Keenan Wolens Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$293kPhilanthropy$120kReligion$110kHealth$46kHuman Services$20kInternational$13kScience & Tech$11kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$538k · 11 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
21

Total granted

$538k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
-2%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    3× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +92%
  • BT
    BODY TRAFFIC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $30k · revenue +230%
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CM
    COUNTY MUSEUM OF ARTS
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • M
    MuseIque
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -17%
  • TM
    THE MUSIC CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
4
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
5
Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc

Simon wiesenthal center, inc. (the center) is a global jewish human rights activist organization that confronts anti-semitism, hate, stands with israel, defends the safety of jews worldwide, and teaches the lessons of the holocaust for…

Arts & Culture
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
8
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington

As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…

Community Improvement
12
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SINAI TEMPLE: $81,400 · OtherSINAI TEMPLEMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORY ARTS: $75,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORY ARTSJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS AN: $57,382 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANLOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATION: $53,200 · OtherLOS ANGELES JEWISH FEDERATIONIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOUNTY MUSEUM OF ARTS: $30,000 · OtherCOUNTY MUSEUM OF ARTSCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $27,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC+14 more: $49,450 · Other+14 moreARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AN…BODY TRAFFIC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureBODY TRAFFICMuseIque: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMuseIque+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $40,000 · HealthOUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER: $8,500 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,500 · HealthWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $10,000 · InternationalJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $7,398 · PhilanthropyJEWISH ELECTORATE INSTITUTE: $3,600 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $2,500 · Civil RightsJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$408,432Arts & Culture$177,500Health$51,000International$10,000Philanthropy$7,398Civil Rights$6,100Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC: $120,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBODY TRAFFIC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMuseIque: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER: $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $7,398 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ELECTORATE INSTITUTE: $3,600 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds BODY TRAFFIC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MuseIque ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH ELECTORATE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Orna & Keenan Wolens Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Orna & Keenan Wolens Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Orna & Keenan Wolens Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Orna & Keenan Wolens Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Orna & Keenan Wolens Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph