Skip to content
Oregonian Publishing Company Public Benefits Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oregonian Publishing Company Public Benefits Inc

Oregonian publishing company public benefits, inc.

$170k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$160kHealth$114kYouth Development$61kEducation$38kCommunity Improvement$25kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$12kInternational$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,876
Median grant
1
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Commons Law Center$15,811
SILETZ REGALIA SHARING CO-OP$13,841
KATHY'S PLACE$13,730
Community Transitional School$13,552
Forward Stride$12,921
Bradley Angle$12,903
Albertina Kerr Centers$12,876
Street Roots$12,723
Serendipity Center Inc$12,446
All Ages Music Portland$12,316
Looking Glass Community Services$12,293
Portland Literacy Council$12,292
St Johns Food Share$12,242
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH VILLAGES: $12k → 10%SILETZ REGALIA SHARING CO-OP: $14k → 14%SANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIP: $12k → 11%STONE SOUP: $12k → 12%Community Transitional School: $14k → 12%Albertina Kerr Centers: $13k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $11k → 12%TRAUMA INTERVENTION: $11k → 12%Bradley Angle: $13k → 12%COMMUNITY FOR POSITIVE AGING: $13k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$257k · 10 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$257k
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+40%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Lines for Life
    2× · 2023–2024 · $28k · revenue +20%
  • ML
    MICHELLES LOVE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k · revenue +50%
  • UN
    URBAN NATURE PARTNERS PDX
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • WI
    WESHINE INITIATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue ×12
  • HS
    Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aginggraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +40%
  • LO
    LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
2
Olalla Center

To help strengthen and heal children and families, and the community. olalla center's staff believes all children and families can heal and this premise is the foundation of olalla center's treatment philosophy and the basis for their work.

—
3
Morrison Child and Family Services

Helping kids be kids, and supporting families when they need us most. morrison serves over 8,000 youth and families annually through ten distinct programs designed to meet the needs of our clients.

Health
4
Rimrock Trails Treatment Services

To improve the lives of those struggling with mental health and/or substance use by providing timely access to compassionate and effective behavioral healthcare.

Health
5
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
6
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
7
Family and Community Together

Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…

Human Services
8
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
9
We Belong Pdx

Webelongpdx is dedicated to supporting children's mental health through proactive and comprehensive year-round out-of-school investment. we run programs that operate 42 weeks a year, offering enriching activities twice a week to children…

Youth Development
10
A Family for Every Child

A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…

Human Services
11
The Arc Oregon

The arc of oregon, together with its network of members and affiliated chapters, advocates for the rights and full community participation of all children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
12
Young Roots Oregon

The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bradley Angle; the most unlike its peers is Sande School of Horsemanship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIP: $25,583 · Human ServicesSANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIPLatino Network: $24,886 · Human ServicesLatino NetworkBradley Angle: $12,903 · Human ServicesBradley AngleALBERTINA KERR CENTERS: $12,876 · Human ServicesALBERTINA KERR CENTERSHollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging: $12,756 · Human ServicesHollywood Senior Center dba Commu…YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $12,110 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES INCSTONE SOUP PDX: $11,676 · Human ServicesSTONE SOUP PDXOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $11,130 · Human ServicesOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORAT…Trauma Intervention Program of Portland Vancouver Inc: $11,110 · Human ServicesTrauma Intervention Program of Po…Lines for Life: $27,553 · HealthLines for LifeMICHELLES LOVE: $27,410 · HealthMICHELLES LOVENEUROTHERAPEUTIC PEDIATRIC THERAPIES INC: $23,780 · HealthNEUROTHERAPEUTIC PEDIA…GO THE DISTANCE: $11,621 · HealthGO THE DISTANCECATHOLIC CHARITIES: $28,349 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESWESHINE INITIATIVE: $14,865 · OtherWESHINE INITIATIVESt Johns Food Share: $12,242 · OtherSt Johns Food ShareTHE DOUGY CENTER INC: $11,885 · OtherTHE DOUGY CENTER INCASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND: $11,385 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BENDTHE DENTAL FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $11,210 · OtherTHE DENTAL FOUNDATION OF OR…DOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $11,160 · OtherDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA D…TRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $10,985 · OtherTRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICESSEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTER: $24,812 · EducationSEASHORE …LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $12,180 · EducationLOVE ONE …URBAN NATURE PARTNERS PDX: $25,264 · Youth DevelopmentROGUE VALLEY MENTORING: $11,257 · Youth DevelopmentPORTLAND SHED INC: $24,842 · Community ImprovementBRIDGING VOICES: $24,359 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$135,030Health$90,364Other$112,081Education$36,992Youth Development$36,521Community Improvement$24,842Arts & Culture$24,359

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLines for Life: $27,553 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMICHELLES LOVE: $27,410 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSANDE SCHOOL OF HORSEMANSHIP: $25,583 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetURBAN NATURE PARTNERS PDX: $25,264 over 2y, 11% of budgetLatino Network: $24,886 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEASHORE FAMILY LITERACY CENTER: $24,812 over 2y, 17% of budgetBRIDGING VOICES: $24,359 over 2y, 19% of budgetNEUROTHERAPEUTIC PEDIATRIC THERAPIES INC: $23,780 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWESHINE INITIATIVE: $14,865 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetBradley Angle: $12,903 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALBERTINA KERR CENTERS: $12,876 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging: $12,756 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $12,180 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC: $12,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC: $11,885 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTONE SOUP PDX: $11,676 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGO THE DISTANCE: $11,621 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND: $11,385 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetROGUE VALLEY MENTORING: $11,257 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE DENTAL FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $11,210 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $11,160 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $11,130 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrauma Intervention Program of Portland Vancouver Inc: $11,110 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTRILLIUM FAMILY SERVICES: $10,985 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Marie Lamfrom Charita…Hillman Family Founda…Careoregon IncThe Robert D and Marc…The Collins FoundationThe Autzen FoundationBraemar Charitable Tr…OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Holzman FoundationJuan Young TrustMeyer Memorial Trust
The Oregon Community FoundationOR37.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Hillman Family Foundations · Careoregon Inc · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Holzman Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregonian Publishing Company Public Benefits Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregonian Publishing Company Public Benefits Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Lines for Life: 69% of income from government
  • Albertina Kerr Centers: 58% of income from government
  • Rogue Valley Mentoring: 46% of income from government
  • Oregon Human Development Corporation: 45% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 23% of income from government
  • Bradley Angle: 13% of income from government
  • Hollywood Senior Center dba Community for Positive Aging: 5% of income from government
  • Bridging Voices: 5% of income from government
  • Trauma Intervention Program of Portland Vancouver Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Trillium Family Services: 3% of income from government
  • Neurotherapeutic Pediatric Therapies Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Dougy Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oregonian Publishing Company Public Benefits Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oregonian Publishing Company Public Benefits Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregonian Publishing Company Public Benefits’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home