Skip to content
Oregon Worker Relief at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Oregon Worker Relief

OREGON WORKER RELIEF is organized exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$660kCrime & Legal$283kCivil Rights$220kCommunity Improvement$200kEducation$80kHealth$60kHousing & Shelter$50k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $767,838, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,275,038 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,507,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k18 grants · $433k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $335k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INNOVATION LAW LAB$160,000
PACIFIC REFUGEE SUPPORT GROUP$95,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$80,338
LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$35,000
PUEBLO UNIDO PDX$35,000
NATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER ADVOC$35,000
LATINO NETWORK$35,000
AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK$35,000
CLEAR CLINIC$25,000
ADELANTE MUJERES$25,000
BIENESTAR INC$20,000
RURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT$20,000
CENTRO DE AYUDA$20,000
OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$20,000
DE ROSE COMMUNITY BRIDGE AND HOLISTIC WELLNESS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $860k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $35k → 10%NATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER ADVOC: $70k → 13%CONSEJO HISPANO: $20k → 13%CENTRO DE AYUDA-NEWPORT: $45k → 16%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS: $20k → 18%EUVALCREE: $30k → 20%LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $20k → 10%NATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER ADVOC: $35k → 13%CONSEJO HISPANO: $20k → 13%CENTRO DE AYUDA: $20k → 16%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS: $10k → 18%EUVALCREE: $20k → 20%LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $20k → 10%PUEBLO UNIDO: $70k → 12%NATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE UNETE CENTER FOR FARM WORKER ADVOC: $20k → 13%CENTRO DE AYUDA INC: $20k → 16%EUVALCREE: $20k → 20%PUEBLO UNIDO PDX: $35k → 12%AFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK: $35k → 8%PUEBLO UNIDO: $20k → 12%ADELANTE MUJERES: $25k → 8%PACIFIC REFUGEE SUPPORT GROUP: $95k → 12%ADELANTE MUJERES: $20k → 8%LATINO NETWORK: $35k → 12%ADELANTE MUJERES: $20k → 8%LATINO NETWORK: $20k → 12%LATINO NETWORK: $20k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 12%OREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 17 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+60%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $263k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IL
    Innovation Law Lab
    2× · 2022–2024 · $170k · revenue +24%
  • NO
    NATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +22%
  • CD
    Centro de Servicios Para Campesinos
    3× · 2022–2024 · $110k · revenue +244%

Funded once

  • UB
    UNIDOS BRIDGING COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • TN
    THE NEXT DOOR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Causa of Oregon

Causa works to improve the lives of latino immigrants and their families through advocacy, leadership development, civic engagement and coalition building. latino immirgants and their families are the heart of causa and inspire, implement…

—
2
Central Washington Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.

Community Improvement
3
Latin American Coalition

The Coalition is dedicated to educating Latino immigrant newcomers, celebrating hispanic culture, and advocating for underserved segments of the population. Programs and initiatives include economic development, legal counsel, community…

Human Services
4
Latino Political Network
—
5
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
6
Al Otro Lado

Al otro lado (aol) provides innovative cross-border legal services to refugees, deportees, and other migrantsin tijuana, mexico and throughout throughout the u.s., with a focus on southern california. aol's mission is to uplift immigrant…

Human Services
7
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
8
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
9
We Are Comunidad

Comunidad seeks to build community, cultural pride, and economic opportunities for the Latino community on Vashon Island and its neighboring communities.

Human Services
10
Latino Network Action Fund

Latino network action fund seeks to create a more representative democracy in oregon.

Community Improvement
11
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
12
Oregon Latino Health Coalition

Oregon latino health coalition advances the health of latinos through policy, advocacy, and prevention.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Plaza De Nuestra Comunidad; the most unlike its peers is Natives of One Wind Indigenous Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pueblo Unido PDX: $125,000 · Human ServicesPueblo Unido PDXNATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE: $125,000 · Human ServicesNATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCEPACIFIC REFUGEE SUPPORT GROUP: $95,000 · Human ServicesPACIFIC REFUGEE SUPPORT GROUPCENTRO DE AYUDA: $85,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO DE AYUDALatino Network: $75,000 · Human ServicesLatino NetworkLATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONEUVALCREE: $70,000 · Human ServicesEUVALCREEADELANTE MUJERES: $65,000 · Human ServicesADELANTE MUJERESConsejo Hispano: $40,000 · Human ServicesOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $40,000 · Human ServicesAFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK: $35,000 · Human ServicesCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY: $30,000 · Human ServicesInnovation Law Lab: $170,000 · Civil RightsInnovation Law L…RURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT: $50,000 · Civil RightsRURAL ORGANIZING…UNIDOS BRIDGING COMMUNITY: $10,000 · Civil RightsCentro de Servicios Para Campesinos: $110,000 · OtherCentro de Se…Mano A Mano: $50,000 · OtherMano A ManoPCUN: $15,000 · OtherPCUNDE ROSE COMMUNITY BRIDGE AND HOLISTIC WELLNESS: $60,000 · HealthPLAZA DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD: $50,000 · HealthVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $80,338 · EducationBIENESTAR INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCLEAR CLINIC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalOREGON LAW CENTER: $12,500 · Crime & LegalTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$860,000Civil Rights$230,000Other$175,000Health$110,000Education$80,338Housing & Shelter$50,000Crime & Legal$47,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInnovation Law Lab: $170,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetPueblo Unido PDX: $125,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetNATIVES OF ONE WIND INDIGENOUS ALLIANCE: $125,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCentro de Servicios Para Campesinos: $110,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetPACIFIC REFUGEE SUPPORT GROUP: $95,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRO DE AYUDA: $85,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $80,338 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLatino Network: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetEUVALCREE: $70,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES: $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDE ROSE COMMUNITY BRIDGE AND HOLISTIC WELLNESS: $60,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMano A Mano: $50,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPLAZA DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT: $50,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBIENESTAR INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetConsejo Hispano: $40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetOREGON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAFGHAN SUPPORT NETWORK: $35,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY: $30,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCLEAR CLINIC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetOREGON LAW CENTER: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIDOS BRIDGING COMMUNITY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE NEXT DOOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seeding JusticeThe Oregon Community …The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustThe Ford Family Found…Ronald W Naito Md Fou…Northwest Health Foun…Umpqua Bank Charitabl…Northwest Health Foun…Pacificsource Foundat…United Way of the Col…The Roundhouse Founda…
Seeding JusticeOR40.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seeding Justice · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Northwest Health Foundation · Pacificsource Foundation for Health Improvement · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · The Roundhouse Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon Worker Relief funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon Worker Relief. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Pueblo Unido Pdx: 100% of income from government
  • De Rose Community Bridge and Holistic Wellness: 44% of income from government
  • Oregon Human Development Corporation: 40% of income from government
  • The Next Door Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Casa Latinos Unidos De Benton County: 36% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • Afghan Support Network: 29% of income from government
  • Centro de Servicios Para Campesinos: 29% of income from government
  • Euvalcree: 18% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Oregon Law Center: 11% of income from government
  • Latino Community Association: 11% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Centro De Ayuda: 5% of income from government
  • Clear Clinic: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oregon Worker Relief?

Find your warmest path to Oregon Worker Relief through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon Worker Relief’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home