Skip to content
Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing

Relieve poverty and distress through the development, construction, and operation of safe, sanitary, and affordable low-income housing in oregon and other states.

$22k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$92k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $12,323, the rows itemized in this filing. The $22,473 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,150 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$12,323
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATH VENTURES$12,323
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC: $7k → 11%PATH VENTURES: $12k → 14%RURAL ULSTER PRESERVATION COMPANY INC: $8k → 16%AUSTIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION: $8k → 10%LIFENET COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $8k → 14%NEW HOPE HOUSING INC: $8k → 16%HOMESTEAD AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $8k → 9%IMPACT SEVEN INC: $8k → 13%COLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORPORATION: $8k → 16%NEIGHBORWORKS UMPQUA: $8k → 17%HIGHLAND COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC: $8k → 17%DELTA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6k → 32%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
OR
CA
WV
AZ
KS
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Housing Company

To address the concern of an inadequate supply of affordable, decent rental housing within the state of Idaho and other states and other similar areas of need. The Housing Company was created to encourage the development, management and…

Unclassified
2
Rural Communities Housing Development Corporation - Parent

To provide decent and affordable housing to low and moderate income persons.

Housing & Shelter
3
Neighborhood Housing Services of Waco

Building stronger neighborhoods through homeownership, quality rental housing and community building initiatives.

Housing & Shelter
4
Archway Housing & Services

To provide safe, habitable housing for families with low to moderate incomes, including homeless families, and to develop mixed income housing to help low income families in the transition to self-sufficiency while providing comprehensive…

Housing & Shelter
5
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
6
Utah Regional Housing Corporation

Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.

Housing & Shelter
7
Housing Partnerships Inc

Housing Partnerships, Inc creates great communities through direct investments and partnerships.

Housing & Shelter
8
Contemporary Housing Alternatives of Florida Inc

Our mission is focused on urban revitalization by providing affordable, vibrant, multi-family housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. we offer rental units throughout pinellas county at and below market rates to…

Housing & Shelter
9
Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corp

Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
10
Home Line

To improve public and private policies relating to rental housing by involving affected tenants in the process.

Housing & Shelter
11
Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
12
Archway Investment Corporation Inc

To develop affordable housing for low and moderate income families and seniors.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Affordable Housing Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Lifenet Community Behavioral Healthcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PATH VENTURES: $12,323 · Housing & ShelterPATH VENTURESRUPCO INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterRUPCO INCAUSTIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterAUSTIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATIONCOLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORP: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORPUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPNew Hope Housing Inc: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterNew Hope Housing IncHOMESTEAD AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHOMESTEAD AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCDelta Housing Development Corporation: $5,500 · Housing & ShelterDelta Housing Development CorporationHighland Community Builders Inc: $7,500 · EmploymentHighland …IMPACT SEVEN INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementIMPACT SE…LIFENET COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $7,500 · OtherLIFENET C…NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC: $7,000 · Health
Housing & Shelter$62,823Employment$7,500Community Improvement$7,500Other$7,500Health$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPATH VENTURES: $12,323 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRUPCO INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHighland Community Builders Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetIMPACT SEVEN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORP: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFENET COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hope Housing Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMESTEAD AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Housing Development Corporation: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Community …Local Initiatives Sup…National Equity Fund …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Enterprise Community Partners IncMD17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · National Equity Fund Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 53%
  • Columbia Cascade Housing Corp: 53% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing?

Find your warmest path to Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home