· Public charity
Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing
Relieve poverty and distress through the development, construction, and operation of safe, sanitary, and affordable low-income housing in oregon and other states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $12,323 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $22,473 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,150 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PATH VENTURES | $12,323 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To address the concern of an inadequate supply of affordable, decent rental housing within the state of Idaho and other states and other similar areas of need. The Housing Company was created to encourage the development, management and…
To provide decent and affordable housing to low and moderate income persons.
Building stronger neighborhoods through homeownership, quality rental housing and community building initiatives.
To provide safe, habitable housing for families with low to moderate incomes, including homeless families, and to develop mixed income housing to help low income families in the transition to self-sufficiency while providing comprehensive…
Development of affordable housing
Provide housing to low-income families in provo, utah.
Housing Partnerships, Inc creates great communities through direct investments and partnerships.
Our mission is focused on urban revitalization by providing affordable, vibrant, multi-family housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. we offer rental units throughout pinellas county at and below market rates to…
Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.
To improve public and private policies relating to rental housing by involving affected tenants in the process.
Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.
To develop affordable housing for low and moderate income families and seniors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Affordable Housing Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Lifenet Community Behavioral Healthcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PATH VENTURES ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA CASCADE HOUSING CORP ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds IMPACT SEVEN INC ↗
- Who funds RUPCO INC ↗
- Who funds HOMESTEAD AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Highland Community Builders Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFENET COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Delta Housing Development Corporation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · National Equity Fund Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Columbia Cascade Housing Corp — 53% of income from government
- Umpqua Community Development Corp — 12% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing?
Find your warmest path to Oregon Corporation for Affordable Housing through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.