Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Oregon Alliance of Independent Colleges & Universities

The mission of the alliance is to represent and serve oregon's regionally accredited, nonprofit, independent colleges and universities through public advocacy, institutional cooperation, and strategic collaboration with the public sector, including business, philanthropic organizations, and government.

$588k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Education$3.8MOther$650
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $481k
$67,215
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$116,215
LINFIELD UNIVERSITY$96,215
BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY$78,125
CORBAN UNIVERSITY$72,215
UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND$67,215
LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE$51,215
WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY$36,215
GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY$24,215
PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$21,215
REED COLLEGE$21,215
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $58k → 8%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $52k → 11%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $82k → 14%BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY: $87k → 15%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $43k → 11%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $72k → 14%BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY: $78k → 15%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $31k → 11%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $52k → 14%BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY: $71k → 15%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $24k → 11%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $46k → 14%NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $69k → 15%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY: $49k → 15%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $27k → 14%BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY: $46k → 15%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $128k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $82k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $63k → 14%LINFIELD COLLEGE: $101k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $78k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $49k → 14%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $96k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $67k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $37k → 14%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $92k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $62k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $36k → 14%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $91k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $55k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 14%LINFIELD UNIVERSITY: $78k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $51k → 12%WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $27k → 14%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $229k → 12%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $204k → 12%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $179k → 12%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $137k → 12%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $116k → 12%WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $116k → 12%LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $62k → 12%LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $52k → 12%LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $51k → 12%LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $50k → 12%LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $47k → 12%MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $30k → 12%MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY: $27k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 10 repeat orgs$650 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against -100% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$3.7M
$650

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-100%

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $982k · revenue +6%
  • LU
    Linfield University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $587k · revenue +3%
  • BU
    BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $401k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $650 · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

4
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
5
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

9
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
10
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Portland and the most unlike its peers is Concordia University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $981,686 · EducationWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITYLinfield University — $586,766 · EducationLinfield UniversityBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $400,975 · EducationBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $395,609 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PORTLANDCORBAN UNIVERSITY — $314,440 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITYLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE — $286,244 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGEWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY — $246,910 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITYGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $189,282 · EducationPACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $154,475 · Education+2 more — $224,941 · Education+2 moreCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — $650 · Other
Education$3,781,328Other$650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $981,686 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetLinfield University — $586,766 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $400,975 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $395,609 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY — $314,440 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE — $286,244 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY — $246,910 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $189,282 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $154,475 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE — $117,054 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY — $107,887 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Linfield University
  • Who funds BUSHNELL UNIVERSITY FKA NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds REED INSTITUTE
  • Who funds MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dale Krueger ScholarshipWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dale Krueger Scholarship · Leo Adler Trust · The Renaissance Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oregon Alliance of Independent Colleges & Universities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Warner Pacific University8% of income from government
  • Bushnell University Fka Northwest Christian University5% of income from government
  • Pacific University5% of income from government
  • Willamette University4% of income from government
  • Linfield University4% of income from government
  • Corban University4% of income from government
  • George Fox University3% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College2% of income from government
  • University of Portland2% of income from government
  • Reed Institute0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph