Skip to content

California · Public charity

Optimist Club of Country Club

To provide companionship and guidance to underprivileged and abused children

$493k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Itemized grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
67%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$421k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$90,686
Organizations funded a year
1 to 11
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$2.8M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations Optimist Club of Country Club funded were first-time grantees, receiving 83% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $368k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$421k27%
FY20246$443k67%
FY20236$40k67%
FY202211$179k73%
FY20211$81k0%
FY20203$38k0%
FY20198$129k25%
FY20188$113k75%
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.2MHealth$140kRecreation & Sports$122kPhilanthropy$56kHuman Services$32kEducation$21kReligion$11kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Evolve You Foundation$231,279770%
Compassion Planet$212,89927%
The Playmakers Organization Inc$150,000330%
San Juan Unified School District$82,5003n/a
Paradise Oask Youth Services$58,0312n/a
About Kidz$45,99346%
Playmakers$30,0001n/a
Hype Fastpitch$25,00035%
CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter$25,00012%
Neighborhood Wellness Foundation$25,00012%
Show all 24 grantees
All grantees of Optimist Club of Country Club by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Evolve You Foundation$231,279770%
Compassion Planet$212,89927%
The Playmakers Organization Inc$150,000330%
San Juan Unified School District$82,5003n/a
Paradise Oask Youth Services$58,0312n/a
About Kidz$45,99346%
Playmakers$30,0001n/a
Hype Fastpitch$25,00035%
CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter$25,00012%
Neighborhood Wellness Foundation$25,00012%
Paradise Oaks Youth Services$24,93820%
Morton Golf Foundation$24,5991n/a
Triad Family Services$23,15030%
A Little T&C$20,251234%
Supporting the Taylor House Inc$20,00016%
Social Venture Partners of Sacramento$20,000210%
Sacramento Splash$20,00012%
Wose Community Church$19,3612n/a
Bradshaw Christian School$15,06520%
Hooked on Fishing Not on Violence Foundation$15,0001n/a
City Year Inc$15,00010%
Morton Golf Foundation$13,88714%
Mira Loma High School - I B Parents Organization$5,903112%
IHS Music Boosters$5,4661n/a

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($427k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Optimist Club of Country Club supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEvolve You Foundation: $231,279 over 7y, 70% of budgetCompassion Planet: $212,899 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetThe Playmakers Organization Inc: $150,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetAbout Kidz: $45,993 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetHype Fastpitch: $25,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNeighborhood Wellness Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetParadise Oaks Youth Services: $24,938 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTriad Family Services: $23,150 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetA Little T&C: $20,251 over 2y, 34% of budgetSupporting the Taylor House Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetSocial Venture Partners of Sacramento: $20,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSacramento Splash: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBradshaw Christian School: $15,065 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCity Year Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMorton Golf Foundation: $13,887 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetMira Loma High School - I B Parents Organization: $5,903 over 1y, 12% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Optimist Club of Country Club with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Optimist Club of Country Club?

Find your warmest path to Optimist Club of Country Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Optimist Club of Country Club

How much does Optimist Club of Country Club give?
Optimist Club of Country Club reported 11 itemized grants totaling $421,344, out of $493,163 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Optimist Club of Country Club fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Youth Development (73%), Health (9%), Recreation & Sports (8%).
Who are Optimist Club of Country Club's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Evolve You Foundation ($231k), Compassion Planet ($213k), The Playmakers Organization Inc ($150k).
Does Optimist Club of Country Club fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Optimist Club of Country Club?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sacramento Region Community Foundation, Teichert Foundation, Sierra Health Foundation.
Where is Optimist Club of Country Club based?
Optimist Club of Country Club is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Optimist Club of Country Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph