Skip to content

· Public charity

Openlands

OPENLANDS protects the natural and open spaces of northeastern illinois and the surrounding region to ensure cleaner air and water, protect natural habitats and wildlife, and help balance and enrich our lives.OPENLANDS' vision for the region is a landscape that includes a vast network of land and water trails, tree-lined streets, and…

$284k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.7MRecreation & Sports$156kFood & Nutrition$77kCommunity Improvement$57kPublic Benefit$50kArts & Culture$45kEducation$45kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 21 grants below total $246,854, the rows itemized in this filing. The $283,913 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,059 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE$56,474
VILLAGE OF FRANKLIN PARK$10,000
FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION$10,000
FOREST PRESERVES OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY$10,000
VILLAGE OF PORT BARRINGTON$10,000
BEE HAVEN$10,000
LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION$10,000
NILES TOWNSHIP GOVERNMENT$10,000
VILLAGE OF SOUTH HOLLAND$10,000
VILLAGE OF BOLINGBROOK$10,000
HISTORY CENTER OF LAKE FOREST LAKE BLUFF$10,000
CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS$10,000
FOX VALLEY PARK DISTRICT$10,000
RIVERDALE PARK DISTRICT$10,000
THE FORGE CHARITABLE ADVENTURES NFP$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 32% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KLEO INC: $15k → 13%VILLAGE OF OSWEGO: $10k → 6%MCHENRY COUNTY DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION (MCDOT): $10k → 6%PLEASANT DALE PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 7%VILLAGE OF BOLINGBROOK: $10k → 7%KANE COUNTY FARM BUREAU: $10k → 8%VILLAGE OF DAVIS JUNCTION: $10k → 9%BOONE COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT: $10k → 9%LAKE CARROLL ASSOCIATION: $10k → 13%CITY OF GENOA: $10k → 13%VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG: $10k → 14%CITY OF FREEPORT: $10k → 14%Village of Seneca Park Board: $10k → 15%FOREST PRESERVES OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY: $10k → 15%VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY: $10k → 6%Mchenry County Conservation District: $10k → 6%BUTTERFIELD PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 7%WAUKEGAN PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 8%CITY OF BELVIDERE: $10k → 9%VILLAGE OF PEARL CITY: $10k → 14%FOREST PRESERVES OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY: $10k → 15%Kendall County Forest Preserve District: $10k → 6%LOMBARD PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $10k → 7%VILLAGE OF BANNOCKBURN: $10k → 8%DEKALB COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT: $10k → 13%FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%RockfordPark District: $10k → 15%KENDALL COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT: $10k → 6%CITY OF CRYSTAL LAKE: $10k → 6%CAMPTON TOWNSHIP PARKSOPEN SPACE: $10k → 8%Illinois Arborist Association: $12k → 8%Dekalb Park District: $10k → 13%YOUNG MEN'S EDUCATIONAL NETWORK: $10k → 14%VILLAGE OF LENA: $10k → 14%CRYSTAL LAKE PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 6%THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $10k → 7%VILLAGE OF UNIVERSITY PARK: $10k → 7%LALE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE: $1.4M → 8%HEALTHY SCHOOLS CAMPAIGN: $13k → 14%FARM FOUNDATION: $15k → 7%FARM FOUNDATION: $14k → 7%Healthy Schools Campaign: $150k → 14%HEALTHY SCHOOLS CAMPAIGN: $111k → 14%THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $56k → 14%SIERRA CLUB: $30k → 14%Sierra Club- Illinois Chapter: $25k → 14%SIERRA CLUB - ILLINOIS CHAPTER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 47% of Openlands’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 52%.

Openlandslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$702k · 16 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
100

Total granted

$702k
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+19%

Still filing today

25%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Healthy Schools Campaign
    5× · 2017–2023 · $281k · revenue -4%
  • SC
    SIERRA CLUB
    4× · 2017–2021 · $80k · revenue -41%
  • TW
    THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $66k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • LC
    LALE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE
    one grant, 2023 · $1.4M
  • KI
    Kleo Inc dba ClassWallet
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • IA
    Illinois Arborist Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grand Prairie Friends

To restore, preserve, and protect natural areas in illinois by acquiring land containing significant natural communities and to provide stewardship to restore and maintain the native ecosystems in these areas.

Environment
2
Glacial Lakes Conservancy Inc

Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.

Environment
3
Friends of Sears Sunken Garden

Friends of Sears Sunken Garden promotes and assists in the redesign, construction and maintenance of the historic Sears Sunken Garden located in the North Lawndale neighborhood of the City of Chicago for the use and enjoyment of the…

Environment
4
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
5
The Forest Park Conservancy

To protect and restore the ecological health of forest park and marquam nature park, maintain and enhance their extensive trails networks, promote equitable access, and inspire diverse community appreciation and stewardship of these iconic…

Environment
6
The Lincoln Park Conservancy Inc

The primary program of the lincoln park conservancy is to grow a sustainable organic garden.

Arts & Culture
7
Heartlands Conservancy

The mission of heartlands conservancy is to empower and colaborate with the people of southern illinois to advance and protect the health of our distinctive communities and nationally significant natural and cultural resources.

Environment
8
Illinois Audubon Society

To promote the perpetuation and appreciation of native flora and fauna of illinois and the habitats that support them.

Environment
9
Plant Chicago Nfp

Plant Chicago's mission is to cultivate local circular economies. We envision a paradigm shift in production, consumption, and waste driven at the local level, generating equity and economic opportunity for all residents.

Food & Nutrition
10
Lincoln Park Conservancy

The mission of the lincoln park conservancy is to preserve and enhance the inspiring beauty of chicago's largest and most visited park for current and future generations. we believe that beauty matters. that it has the transformative power…

Recreation & Sports
11
Wisconsin's Green Fire Incorporated

Advance science-informed analysis and policy solutions that address wisconsin's greatest conservation challenges.

Environment
12
Land Conservation Foundation

To preserve and restore natural communities in east central illinois, to create interconnected corridors, to provide wildlife habitat, and connect people and nature for future generations.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Forest Open Lands Association; the most unlike its peers is Grand Victoria Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
17/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LALE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE: $1,360,738 · OtherLALE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE+111 more: $1,219,713 · Other+111 moreHealthy Schools Campaign: $280,647 · EnvironmentHealthy Schools…THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $66,474 · EnvironmentTHE WETLANDS IN…+8 more: $80,000 · Environment+8 moreYoung Mens Educational Network: $10,000 · EducationACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationGARDENEERS: $10,000 · EducationGovernors State University Foundation: $10,000 · EducationFARM FOUNDATION: $29,070 · Food & NutritionNEIGHBORSPACE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementLONG GROVE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY: $10,000 · Community ImprovementThe Wilder World Trust NFP: $10,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7,847 · AnimalsGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,580,451Environment$427,121Education$40,000Food & Nutrition$29,070Community Improvement$20,000Animals$17,847Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHealthy Schools Campaign: $280,647 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $66,474 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFARM FOUNDATION: $29,070 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetIllinois Arborist Association Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSTAR FARM CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCITIZENS FOR CONSERVATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForest Preserve Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKANE FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetKANE COUNTY FARM BUREAU: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYoung Mens Educational Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGAYLORD BUILDING HISTORIC SITE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FOREST PRESERVES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRESERVATION FOUNDATION OF THE LAKE COUNTY FOREST PRESERVES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Wilder World Trust NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLAKE BLUFF OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetNEIGHBORSPACE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHistory Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetACADEMY FOR GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARDENEERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLONG GROVE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGovernors State University Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHICAGO PARKS FOUNDATION: $7,851 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $7,847 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Healthy Schools Campaign ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Arborist Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds STAR FARM CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR CONSERVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ST FRANCIS ↗
  • Who funds Forest Preserve Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds KANE FOREST PRESERVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KANE COUNTY FARM BUREAU ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morton ArboretumIL86.2× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morton Arboretum · Metropolitan Mayors Caucus · Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation · The Lumpkin Family Foundation · Forefront · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Walder Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · Oberweiler Foundation · Harold M & Adeline S Morrison Family Foundation · Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp · The Chicago Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Openlands funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Openlands. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Openlands’ filings →

    More from the funding graph