Skip to content

· Private foundation

Open Society Institute

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$147M
Granted FY2024still arriving
559
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$38M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$603MInternational$126MCivil Rights$86MSocial Science$82MArts & Culture$41MPublic Benefit$40MPhilanthropy$38MCrime & Legal$26MOther$0
02FY2024 · 559 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k261 grants · $384k
  • $10k–50k111 grants · $2.6M
  • $50k–250k127 grants · $12M
  • $250k+60 grants · $132M
$15,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$5.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY$38,025,318
CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY$31,983,066
BARD COLLEGE$12,500,000
MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT FUND$5,000,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$5,000,000
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION$3,000,000
BARD COLLEGE$2,825,471
ASPIRATION$2,000,000
RESET TECH$2,000,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$1,500,000
INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC$1,500,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$1,350,000
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS ASSOCIATES$1,250,000
ACCESS NOW$1,200,000
TRANSPARENTEM$1,000,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($915M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($236M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $11.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UPLIFT AFGHANISTAN FUND: $750k → 10%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $250k → 10%NEW YORK TAXI WORKERS ALLIANCE: $75k → 13%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE: $30k → 10%UPLIFT AFGHANISTAN FUND: $750k → 10%PROGRES FOUNDATION CORPORATION: $185k → 7%UPLIFT AFGHANISTAN FUND: $573k → 10%KOREAN AMERICAN FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INTERNATIONAL: $30k → 14%Korean American Food for the Hungry International: $30k → 14%Share A Smile: $30k → 8%TRANSPARENTEM: $1.0M → 17%Women's Refugee Commission: $357k → 17%Accountability Lab: $100k → 14%TRANSPARENTEM: $1.0M → 17%Accountability Lab: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $2.1M → 14%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1.5M → 14%CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $1.0M → 14%Center for Civilians in Conflict: $500k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CIVIL SOCIETY ACTION NETWORK INC: $339k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CIVIL SOCIETY ACTION NETWORK INC: $282k → 14%INTERNATIONAL CIVIL SOCIETY ACTION NETWORK INC: $199k → 14%International Refugee Assistance Project: $400k → 17%THE ENGINE ROOM INC: $82k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($236M)

113 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$37M · 127 grants
OC$22M · 123 grants
Netherlands$14M · 54 grants
Switzerland$12M · 37 grants
Belgium$12M · 51 grants
France$9.7M · 57 grants
Indonesia$9.0M · 22 grants
South Korea$8.4M · 62 grants
Germany$7.8M · 47 grants
Albania$6.3M · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$977M · 1140 repeat orgs$135M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

1140 repeat relationships: 120 still active in FY2024, 1020 since wound down; 189 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1140
647

Total granted

$977M
$117M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+14%

Still filing today

22%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $323M · revenue +158% · 84% of their budget
  • BARD COLLEGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $211M · revenue +256%
  • MD
    MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT FUND INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $19M · revenue +62% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15M · revenue +32% · 33% of their budget
  • SP
    SWISS PHILANTHROPY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2.5M
  • CF
    CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2.1M · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
7
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
8
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shared Interest Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reformed Church of Los Angeles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

412 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 412 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

41
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
86
Early backer (in before they grew)
404/412
Grantees still filing
272/412
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY: $323,184,706 · InternationalTHE CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY+27 more: $62,319,222 · International+27 moreBARD COLLEGE: $211,410,836 · EducationBARD COLLEGE+11 more: $18,809,308 · Education+11 moreTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $15,000,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHO…EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: $7,500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,999,717 · OtherNEW VENTURE FUND: $8,910,250 · Other+133 more: $167,594,368 · Other+133 moreTHE INSTITUTE FOR NEW ECONOMIC THINKING INC: $65,631,346 · Social ScienceGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC: $3,750,000 · Social Science+1 more: $1,170,000 · Social ScienceMEDIA DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT FUND INC: $19,300,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $8,938,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $5,445,600 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,325,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $3,964,458 · PhilanthropyTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $15,000,000 · Arts & CultureGLOBAL INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM NETWORK INC: $1,375,000 · Arts & CultureELLEN JOHNSON SIRLEAF PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureACCESS NOW: $3,050,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $2,479,950 · Civil RightsEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,375,000 · Civil RightsWORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM INC: $1,850,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $1,103,500 · Civil RightsTHE ONLINE PROGRESSIVE ENGAGEMENT NETWORK INC: $750,000 · Civil RightsMIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE: $720,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $580,000 · Civil Rights
International$385,503,928Education$230,220,144Other$206,004,335Social Science$70,551,346Philanthropy$38,973,058Arts & Culture$17,375,000Civil Rights$12,908,450

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY: $323,184,706 over 7y, 84% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $211,410,836 over 8y, 18% of budgetMEDIA DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT FUND INC: $19,300,000 over 4y, 51% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $15,000,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $15,000,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $8,938,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $8,910,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP: $8,795,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetFUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $7,314,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $6,168,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $5,445,600 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetJOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC: $5,273,522 over 4y, 11% of budgetBRAC USA INC: $5,000,750 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE: $5,000,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INT'L INC: $4,484,235 over 6y, 48% of budgetGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC: $3,750,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetAspiration Aspirationtechorg: $3,400,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE: $3,350,150 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetNew York University: $3,206,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS NOW: $3,050,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT: $3,014,550 over 5y, 14% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM: $2,609,890 over 6y, 53% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC: $2,576,709 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $2,479,950 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,375,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetBUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE: $2,156,050 over 8y, 22% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT: $2,114,370 over 1y, 13% of budgetUplift Afghanistan Fund: $2,072,987 over 3y, 69% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,001,836 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSPARENTEM LTD: $2,000,000 over 2y, 71% of budgetASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN (AUW) SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetRESET TECH: $2,000,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetWORKER RIGHTS CONSORTIUM INC: $1,850,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetSCHOLARS AT RISK INC: $1,703,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $1,515,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW INC: $1,400,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetGLOBAL INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM NETWORK INC: $1,375,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING: $1,332,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,325,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $1,241,600 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetACTIONAID USA: $1,170,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,143,621 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $1,137,640 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $1,125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $1,103,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,062,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetELLEN JOHNSON SIRLEAF PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetThe ONE Campaign: $1,000,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR NEW ECONOMIC THINKING INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOURNALISM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INT'L INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Aspiration Aspirationtechorg ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS NOW ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation to Promote Open SocietyNY117.8× affinity157 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation to Promote Open Society · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Scherman Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · National Endowment for Democracy · The Rockefeller Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Open Society Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Open Society Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Code for Science & Society Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University: 1% of income from government
  • Ceres Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Open Society Institute?

Find your warmest path to Open Society Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Open Society Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph