Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP

INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,150,498 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($18,460,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$7.6M
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$55M
Net assets
$11M
5/7 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What International Budget Partnership does

Mission

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that promote equity & justice.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Country work - in five countries in africa and asia, ibp's spark (strengthening public accountability for results and knowledge) initiative is partnering with large, powerful civic organizations and social movements to help them understand the fiscal challenges behind poor service delivery and equip them with the knowledge and tools necessary to effectively advocate for improved public spending.

    $4,728,622 spentof which $1,352,097 as grants
    41% of program spending
  2. Research - ibp's open budget initiative is a global research and advocacy program that promotes public access to government budget information and the adoption of accountable budget systems. The initiative's flagship research product, the bi-annual open budget survey, is the world's only independent, comparative assessment of the three pillars of public budget accountability: transparency, oversight and participation.

    $2,830,554 spentof which $29,281 as grants
    24% of program spending
  3. Training and technical assistance - developing the knowledge and skills of partner organizations in undertaking budget analysis and advocacy, through direct technical assistance as well as support for horizontal learning among the partners.

    $1,517,327 spentof which $245,670 as grants
    13% of program spending
  4. Tax - enhancing the capacities of diverse civic actors and coalitions in africa and at the global level to achieve increased transparency, greater civic participation in tax deliberations, and movement toward more equitable revenue collection.

    $1,185,777 spentof which $237,906 as grants
    10% of program spending
  5. Global initiative for fiscal transparency - working to advance and institutionalize global norms and significant, continuous improvements on fiscal transparency, participation, and accountability in countries around the world.

    $659,339 spent$167,542 earned by the program
    6% of program spending
  6. Advocacy - working with a range of actors, including donor and international institutions, governments, national and international cso's, associations of public finance professionals and oversight institutions, and, recently, private sector investors to develop and implement global norms and standards for budget transparency, public participation, and accountability.

    $379,800 spentof which $40,000 as grants
    3% of program spending
  7. Communications - the communications team is responsible for the public face of the ibp and for providing strategic support to its partners and allies. Communications collaborates with other ibp programs to increase the capacity of its civil society partners around the world to effectively engage in government budget processes - and the impact of such engagement - and to improve the context in which these groups do their budget work.

    $163,285 spent
    1% of program spending
  8. Learning - investigating and documenting the methods and impact of civil society budget work at the national and subnational level by working on ibp's learning approach and mainstream it on all ibp's programs.

    $136,787 spent
    1% of program spending

The 8 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $11,601,491.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($18M) Expenses 100 ($11M) Net assets 100 ($23M)2018 Revenue 105 ($19M) Expenses 103 ($11M) Net assets 135 ($31M)2019 Revenue 19 ($3.6M) Expenses 135 ($15M) Net assets 86 ($20M)2020 Revenue 94 ($17M) Expenses 127 ($14M) Net assets 100 ($23M)2021 Revenue 55 ($10M) Expenses 130 ($14M) Net assets 82 ($19M)2022 Revenue 92 ($17M) Expenses 121 ($13M) Net assets 97 ($23M)2023 Revenue 40 ($7.4M) Expenses 123 ($14M) Net assets 71 ($16M)2024 Revenue 41 ($7.6M) Expenses 115 ($13M) Net assets 48 ($11M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (41)Expenses (115)Net assets (48)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $34M to $24M (−29%).

$24M
$34M
$24M
$27M
$23M
$29M
$23M
$15M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 7% · 2018 7% · 2019 61% · 2020 17% · 2021 27% · 2022 31% · 2023 31% · 2024 48%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,679 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$7.4M
’17
$8.0M
’18
−$11M
’19
$3.3M
’20
−$4.2M
’21
$3.5M
’22
−$6.2M
’23
−$5.2M
’24
9.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Ana Patricia Munoz

Executive director

Board chair

Sofia Sprechmann

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1717212018201615
Joined·+2+5+3+1+7+3+2
No longer listed·2143573
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $6.0M → $7.8M.

From the IRS filings of INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 33% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

33%
largest funder
80%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 43% · 2018 36% · 2019 45% · 2020 42% · 2021 50% · 2022 60% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 4 states in all.

WA
NY
CA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,607 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−68% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve9.6mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−12% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,607 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 5%Fundraising 5%

Governance

9
board members
89%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

47%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • International Budget Partnership Kenya · exempt
  • Sitching Ibp Netherlands · exempt
  • Ibpsa Npc · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP?
INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,150,498 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($18,460,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $55,150,498 in grants to INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP?
THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $18,460,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTERNATIONAL BUDGET PARTNERSHIP find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing