Skip to content
Oneprojectorg at a glance

· Private foundation

Oneprojectorg

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Social Science$954kEmployment$580kEnvironment$250kEducation$35kCommunity Improvement$7kPublic Benefit$4kArts & Culture$3kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE$250,000
US SOLIDARITY ECONOMY NETWORK INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%US SOLIDARITY ECONOMY NETWORK INC: $3k → 12%CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC: $5k → 16%URBAN TILTH: $2k → 9%CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $250k → 10%BERGGRUEN INSTITUTE: $950k → 14%BARD COLLEGE: $5k → 14%ACTION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE: $300k → 17%ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $3k → 21%CONVERSATIONS ON THE GREEN INC: $25k → 9%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%US SOLIDARITY ECONOMY NETWORK INC: $1k → 12%SOLIDARITY RESEARCH CENTER: $4k → 14%ACTION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE INC: $220k → 17%ACTION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE INC: $60k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Collaborative Earth Institute

We are scientists and engineers, humanists and designers. Coming together across disciplinary and cultural boundaries, we form focused teams to discover and co-create pathways to social and ecological regeneration.

Science & Tech
2
Center for Contemporary Documentation Inc
Philanthropy
3
The Conversationalist
—
4
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
5
The Urban Land Institute

Shape the future of the built environment for transformative impact in communities worldwide. we are a global network of professionals in every sector of real estate development and land use, from private enterprise to public service.

Environment
6
Move to Amend

Move to Amend is a coalition of hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals committed to social and economic justice, ending corporate rule, and building a vibrant democracy that is genuinely accountable to the…

Civil Rights
7
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
8
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
9
Center for Responsible Science
Philanthropy
10
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
11
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
12
Educator Collective for Envionmental Justice Inc

Environmental Justice & Equality

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Economic Democracy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Berggruen Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Berggruen Institute: $950,000 · EducationBerggruen Institute+3 more: $35,000 · EducationAction Research Collaborative Inc: $580,000 · EmploymentAction Research Collaborative IncCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $250,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTICE…+1 more: $2,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSolidarity Research Center: $4,000 · Social ScienceUS Solidarity Economy Network: $3,800 · Public BenefitALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCooperation Humboldt: $2,100 · Other
Education$985,000Employment$580,000Environment$252,000Community Improvement$5,000Social Science$4,000Public Benefit$3,800Arts & Culture$2,500Other$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBerggruen Institute: $950,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetAction Research Collaborative Inc: $580,000 over 2y, 77% of budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCONVERSATIONS ON THE GREENINC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSolidarity Research Center: $4,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUS Solidarity Economy Network: $3,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCooperation Humboldt: $2,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUrban Tilth: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…ImpactassetsincNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Oneprojectorg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Oneprojectorg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oneprojectorg?

Find your warmest path to Oneprojectorg through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Oneprojectorg’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home