Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Oneprojectorg

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$251k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Social Science$954kEmployment$580kEnvironment$250kEducation$35kCommunity Improvement$7kPublic Benefit$4kArts & Culture$3kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE$250,000
US SOLIDARITY ECONOMY NETWORK INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%US SOLIDARITY ECONOMY NETWORK INC: $3k → 12%CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC: $5k → 16%URBAN TILTH: $2k → 9%CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $250k → 10%BERGGRUEN INSTITUTE: $950k → 14%BARD COLLEGE: $5k → 14%ACTION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE: $300k → 17%ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $3k → 21%CONVERSATIONS ON THE GREEN INC: $25k → 9%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%US SOLIDARITY ECONOMY NETWORK INC: $1k → 12%SOLIDARITY RESEARCH CENTER: $4k → 14%ACTION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE INC: $220k → 17%ACTION RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE INC: $60k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Collaborative Earth Institute

We are scientists and engineers, humanists and designers. Coming together across disciplinary and cultural boundaries, we form focused teams to discover and co-create pathways to social and ecological regeneration.

Science & Tech
2
Center for Contemporary Documentation Inc
Philanthropy
3
The Conversationalist
4
California Institute of Contemporary Art
5
The Urban Land Institute

Shape the future of the built environment for transformative impact in communities worldwide. we are a global network of professionals in every sector of real estate development and land use, from private enterprise to public service.

Environment
6
Move to Amend

Move to Amend is a coalition of hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals committed to social and economic justice, ending corporate rule, and building a vibrant democracy that is genuinely accountable to the…

Civil Rights
7
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
8
Sonoma Mountain Institute
Environment
9
Center for Responsible Science
Philanthropy
10
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

11
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
12
Educator Collective for Envionmental Justice Inc

Environmental Justice & Equality

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Economic Democracy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Berggruen Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Berggruen Institute — $950,000 · EducationBerggruen Institute+3 more — $35,000 · EducationAction Research Collaborative Inc — $580,000 · EmploymentAction Research Collaborative IncCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $250,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTICE…+1 more — $2,000 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $5,000 · Community ImprovementSolidarity Research Center — $4,000 · Social ScienceUS Solidarity Economy Network — $3,800 · Public BenefitALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureCooperation Humboldt — $2,100 · Other
Education$985,000Employment$580,000Environment$252,000Community Improvement$5,000Social Science$4,000Public Benefit$3,800Arts & Culture$2,500Other$2,100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBerggruen Institute — $950,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetAction Research Collaborative Inc — $580,000 over 2y, 77% of budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $250,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCONVERSATIONS ON THE GREENINC — $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSolidarity Research Center — $4,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUS Solidarity Economy Network — $3,800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCooperation Humboldt — $2,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUrban Tilth — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oneprojectorg funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oneprojectorg?

Find your warmest path to Oneprojectorg through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph