· Private foundation
Onefamily
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of Onefamily’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Onefamily named its own grantees at scale: 42 organizations, $704k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k24 grants · $181k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $388k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERCY CORPS | $85,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| UNICEF | $40,000 |
| NAVAJO NATION | $30,000 |
| SEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES - ELDERS WISDOM PROJECT | $15,000 |
| BUILDING CHANGES | $15,000 |
| YOUTHCARE | $12,000 |
| FAMILYWORKS | $12,000 |
| DOWNTOWN EMERGENCY SERVICE CENTER | $12,000 |
| BROADVIEW EMERGENCY SHELTER | $12,000 |
| REFUGEE WOMEN'S ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| THE LEMUR CONSERVATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SAFEPLACE | $10,000 |
| LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES NW | $10,000 |
| MARY'S PLACE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMercy Corps2× · 2019–2020 · $110k · revenue +21%
- CHCARING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL6× · 2019–2024 · $84k · revenue +41% · 40% of their budget
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF2× · 2019–2020 · $65k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- MCMERCY CORPS FOR BAHAMAS RELIEF - HURRICANE DORIANone grant, 2019 · $25k
- PFPEACE FOR THE STREETS BY KIDS FROM THE STREETSone grant, 2019 · $9k
COMMUNITY FOR YOUTHgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +49%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
Transforming lives through safety, healing and empowerment.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
Youth Eastside Services (YES) is a lifeline for kids and families coping with challenges such as emotional distress, substance abuse, and violence. Through intervention, outreach and prevention, YES build confidence and responsibility,…
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
Housing Counseling Services
FVLC helps diverse communities in Alameda County heal from domestic violence and sexual assault, advocating for justice and healthy relationships. We provide survivor-centered legal and crisis intervention services, offer prevention for…
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Educate, advocate, and empower to end violence.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Beginnings and the most unlike its peers is American Indian Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds CARING HEARTS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PRESTWOOD PARENT-TEACHER ORG ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds BUILDING CHANGES ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds FAMILYWORKS ↗
- Who funds Downtown Emergency Service Center ↗
- Who funds COCOON HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
- Who funds POTLATCH FUND ↗
- Who funds INDIAN LAW RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
- Who funds King County Sexual Assault Resource Center ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds TEEN FEED ↗
- Who funds Jumping Mouse Childrens Center ↗
- Who funds Refugee Womens Alliance ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE WOMEN'S NETWORK ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood House INC ↗
- Who funds VENTURES ↗
- Who funds COYOTE CENTRAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Medina Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Gates Foundation · Real Progress Foundation · Fales Foundation Trust · NW Childrens Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Moccasin Lake Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Onefamily funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.