Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ona E Murphy & Robert E Murphy Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$269kHuman Services$263kEducation$27kArts & Culture$17kReligion$7kYouth Development$5kCrime & Legal$4kAnimals$4kOther$270k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN JOAQUIN$40,000
PASS THE WORD MINISTRY$35,360
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$10,000
SHELTER FRIENDS OF JOSEPHINE CO$9,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$7,000
JOSEPHINE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
FRIENDS OF JOSEPHINE CTY S & R$5,000
CANINE ANGELS$4,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF OLATHE$1,153
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION: $18k → 12%WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION: $17k → 12%WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION: $13k → 12%WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION: $13k → 12%WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%HARMONY AT HOME: $1k → 12%WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%ALLIANCE ON AGING: $3k → 12%ALLIANCE ON AGING: $3k → 12%ALLIANCE ON AGING: $2k → 12%ALLIANCE ON AGING: $2k → 12%ALLIANCE ON AGING: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$556k · 21 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$556k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+258%

Still filing today

43%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PT
    PASS THE WORD MINISTRY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $169k · revenue +231% · 58% of their budget
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +83%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $19k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SEARCH AND RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • RV
    ROGUE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +261%
  • TD
    Troops Direct
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Siskiyou Community Food Bank

We provided free healthy food to low-income families and individuals in need.

Food & Nutrition
3
Meals On Wheels of the Monterey Peninsula Inc

To empower seniors, disabled adults, veterans, and other under served populations to remain independent by nourishing their bodies, minds, and spirits, and drive out hunger and isolation in our region.

Food & Nutrition
4
Victory Mission

To operate and maintain a rescue mission at Salinas, California provide Job training

Human Services
5
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services

Dedicated to assisting those in need by alleviating their immediate pain and problems and moving them toward self-sufficiency and financial independence.

6
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
8
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
9
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
10
Volunteers in Medicine - San Francisco

To understand and serve, with dignity and respect, the health and wellness needs of the medically underserved in the san francisco bay area.

Health
11
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
12
Food Bank Coalition of San Luis Obispo County

Procurement and distribution of food to agencies serving the needy.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $258,993 · PhilanthropySAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION IN…+3 more — $10,247 · PhilanthropyJOSEPHINE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER — $58,455 · OtherJOSEPHINE COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTEREY CO — $29,747 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTEREY COCANINE ANGELS — $29,328 · OtherCANINE ANGELSMEALS ON WHEELS — $19,947 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $19,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTYSHELTER FRIENDS OF JOSEPHINE CO — $18,000 · OtherSHELTER FRIENDS OF JOSEPHINE COFRIENDS OF SEARCH AND RESCUE — $16,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SEARCH AND RESCUEBig Sur Health Center Inc — $15,000 · OtherBig Sur Health Center IncJOE'S PLACE MINISTRY — $12,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF JOSEPHINE CTY S & R — $10,000 · Other+13 more — $48,153 · Other+13 morePASS THE WORD MINISTRY INC — $169,260 · Human ServicesPASS THE WORD MINISTRY INCWELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION INC — $81,447 · Human ServicesWELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION INCALLIANCE ON AGING INC — $11,233 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $27,000 · EducationGrants Pass Museum of Art — $17,000 · Arts & CultureSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,000 · ReligionGUITARS NOT GUNS INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$269,240Other$276,130Human Services$262,940Education$27,000Arts & Culture$17,000Religion$7,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $258,993 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPASS THE WORD MINISTRY INC — $169,260 over 7y, 58% of budgetWELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION INC — $81,447 over 7y, 26% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGrants Pass Museum of Art — $17,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetBig Sur Health Center Inc — $15,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE ON AGING INC — $11,233 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAG AGAINST HUNGER — $9,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUITARS NOT GUNS INC — $5,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES FOR SENIORS — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTroops Direct — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARMONY AT HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARMEL VALLEY WOMENS CLUB FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PASS THE WORD MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds WELCOME HOME HEROES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY
  • Who funds Grants Pass Museum of Art
  • Who funds Big Sur Health Center Inc
  • Who funds ALLIANCE ON AGING INC
  • Who funds AG AGAINST HUNGER
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GUITARS NOT GUNS INC
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR SENIORS
  • Who funds ROGUE VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Troops Direct
  • Who funds HARMONY AT HOME
  • Who funds CARMEL VALLEY WOMENS CLUB FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ona E Murphy & Robert E Murphy Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Grants Pass Museum of Art2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph