Skip to content
Omron Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Omron Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$367k
Granted FY2025still arriving
184
Grants FY2025still arriving
24
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$2.2MHealth$434kYouth Development$368kFood & Nutrition$204kHuman Services$194kHousing & Shelter$171kArts & Culture$126kInternational$108kOther$0
02FY2025 · 184 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k176 grants · $229k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $160k
$468
Median grant
24
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Merit Scholarship Corporation$45,152
HealthCorps Inc$30,000
Respiratory Health Assc of Metro Chicago$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,100
Samaritan's Purse$15,000
Concordia Language Services$11,250
Gigi's Playhouse$10,500
American Heart Association$10,000
Techo$7,160
Habitat for Humanity of Northern Fox Val$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
San Fernando Valley Rescue Mission$5,000
Food For The Poor$5,000
American Heart Association$5,000
Northwest Harvest$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $334k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Caregivers: $3k → 10%Techo: $7k → 15%WestSide Baby: $6k → 9%Caregivers: $3k → 10%Center for Developmental Services: $4k → 10%WestSide Baby: $5k → 9%Caregivers: $2k → 10%Center for Developmental Services: $3k → 10%WestSide Baby: $5k → 9%Caregivers: $2k → 10%WestSide Baby: $5k → 9%Omni Youth Services Inc: $7k → 8%CAREGIVERS: $2k → 10%WESTSIDE BABY: $3k → 9%Caregivers: $2k → 10%Omni Youth Services Inc: $4k → 8%WestSide Baby: $3k → 9%The Nashua Center: $10k → 7%The Nashua Center: $5k → 7%Marklund: $20k → 8%The Nashua Center: $5k → 7%Vision House: $2k → 9%Marklund: $15k → 8%The Nashua Center: $5k → 7%Marklund: $8k → 8%The Nashua Center: $4k → 7%Marklund: $4k → 8%THE NASHUA CENTER: $3k → 7%MARKLUND: $4k → 8%Marklund: $4k → 8%North Valley Caring Services: $5k → 14%The Childrens Ranch Foundation: $3k → 14%Clearbrook: $5k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $4k → 14%MEND-Meet Each Need with Dignity: $10k → 14%MEND-Meet Each Need with Dignity: $5k → 14%MEND-Meet Each Need with Digni: $5k → 14%MEND-Meet Each Need with Dignity: $5k → 14%MEND-MEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY: $3k → 14%MEND-Meet Each Need with Digni: $3k → 14%Cradles to Crayons: $10k → 14%Cradles to Crayons: $5k → 14%Cradles to Crayons: $5k → 14%Cradles to Crayons: $4k → 14%The Harbour: $77k → 14%THE HARBOUR: $4k → 14%The Harbour: $3k → 14%The Harbour: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 165 repeat orgs$684k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

165 repeat relationships: 67 still active in FY2025, 98 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

165
235

Total granted

$3.4M
$571k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+12%

Still filing today

68%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthInternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    2× · 2023–2024 · $273k · revenue +18%
  • NC
    North Central College
    6× · 2020–2025 · $231k · revenue +19%
  • NM
    National Merit Scholarship Corporation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $158k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Michigan Dearbo
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • WT
    Wine to Water
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIV OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON
    one grant, 2024 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

287 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 287 of the 449 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
280/287
Grantees still filing
191/287
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chico State University: $550,000 · OtherChico State UniversityUniversity of Michigan Dearborn: $305,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan DearbornUniversity of Michigan Dearbo: $200,000 · OtherUniversity of Michigan DearboGigi's Playhouse: $103,646 · OtherRespiratory Health Assc of Met: $85,053 · Other+115 more: $940,282 · Other+115 moreMarquette University: $272,530 · EducationMarquette UniversityNorth Central College: $230,500 · EducationNorth Central CollegeNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $157,760 · EducationNational Merit Scholarsh…WINNING FUTURES: $50,000 · EducationWINNING FUTURESSME EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Education+14 more: $113,425 · Education+14 moreHEALTHCORPS INC: $235,350 · HealthHEALTHCORPS…American Heart Association Inc: $81,501 · HealthAmerican He…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $20,000 · Health+13 more: $57,588 · Health+13 moreTHE HARBOUR INC: $89,621 · Human ServicesTHE HARBO…MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME: $54,700 · Human ServicesMARKLUND …NASHUA CENTER: $33,350 · Human ServicesNASHUA CE…MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $31,000 · Human ServicesMEND - Me…WESTSIDE BABY: $26,908 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE …CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $23,750 · Human ServicesCRADLES T…CAREGIVERS VOLUNTEERS ASSISTING THE ELDERLY: $13,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,344 · Human Services+13 more: $53,850 · Human Services+13 moreNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $44,816 · Food & NutritionOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $31,000 · Food & NutritionCARES OF FARMINGTON HILLS INC: $10,800 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FORWARD INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $5,200 · Food & NutritionFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $45,898 · InternationalJAPAN AMERICA SOCIETY OF CHICAGO INC: $6,650 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,050 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $5,614 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 · InternationalBRAZIL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $4,200 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,150 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $3,513 · International+3 more: $4,310 · InternationalWine to Water: $50,000 · EnvironmentBEAVER BROOK ASSOCIATION INC: $2,019 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 · Environment+1 more: $1,500 · Environment
Other$2,183,981Education$869,215Health$394,439Human Services$338,523Food & Nutrition$106,816International$90,385Environment$55,519

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $272,530 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCORPS INC: $235,350 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNorth Central College: $230,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $157,760 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARBOUR INC: $89,621 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $81,501 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME: $54,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWine to Water: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWINNING FUTURES: $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $45,898 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSME EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $44,816 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON FIRST ROBOTICS: $34,350 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $33,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNASHUA CENTER: $33,350 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE BABY: $26,908 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSPARTANBURG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEDUCARE FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRESPIRATORY HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKent Schools Foundation: $24,000 over 5y, 33% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $23,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSCITE ILLINOIS: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $17,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY NETWORKS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAREGIVERS VOLUNTEERS ASSISTING THE ELDERLY: $13,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetRESTORING THE PATH: $12,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,344 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOMNI YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED: $11,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF NORTHERN FOX VALLEY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE 4 HARPER: $8,035 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetACADEMY FOR SCIENCE & DESIGN: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUPUS LA CO EMERGE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $7,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,828 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJAPAN AMERICA SOCIETY OF CHICAGO INC: $6,650 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $6,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHCORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds North Central College ↗
  • Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE HARBOUR INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARKLUND CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds Wine to Water ↗
  • Who funds WINNING FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SME EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON FIRST ROBOTICS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds NASHUA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE BABY ↗
  • Who funds SPARTANBURG COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RESPIRATORY HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Kent Schools Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds INSCITE ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…Motorola Solutions Fo…Baxter International …The Norcliffe Foundat…Seattle FoundationThe Bullitt FoundationAbbVie FoundationMoccasin Lake Foundat…Arthur J Gallagher Fo…Raikes FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…T-Mobile USA Foundati…
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE26.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · Baxter International Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Raikes Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · T-Mobile USA Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Omron Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Omron Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Alpha-Omega Miracle Home Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
54report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 449 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Omron’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home