Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Omomuki Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$400kArts & Culture$71kEducation$26kFood & Nutrition$16kEnvironment$16kCivil Rights$15kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$632k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF FIRE ISLAND PINES$15,500
BROADWAY CARES EQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC$11,100
TAIWAN LOVE AND HOPE ASSOCIATION$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,100
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PORTLAND JAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY$1,500
GRIOT CIRCLE$1,000
UBUNTU PATHWAYS$1,000
ALI FORNEY CENTER$1,000
GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS$500
COOL CULTURE INC$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 77% of grant dollars ($426k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($124k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GRIOT CIRCLE: $1k → 20%GRIOT CIRCLE: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US — 23% of all-years giving ($124k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Taiwan$123k · 25 grants
Japan$558 · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$491k · 28 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
20

Total granted

$491k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+20%

Still filing today

36%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationCivil RightsEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +25%
  • GM
    GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +56%
  • JS
    JUILLIARD SCHOOL
    4× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +41%
  • AC
    APICHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +129%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
3
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
4
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
5
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

6
Brooklyn Community Pride Center Inc

Brooklyn community pride center uplifts and empowers lgbtq+ brooklynites through socially conscious and culturally responsive programs, partnerships and advocacy.

Civil Rights
7
The American Theatre Guild

The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.

Arts & Culture
8
Services and Advocacy for Gay Lesbian Bisexual and Transgender Elders Inc

Services and advocacy for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender elders, inc. (sage) is the country's largest and oldest organization dedicated to improving the lives of lgbtq+ older adults. in partnership with our constituents and…

9
Apollo Theater Foundation Inc

The apollo theater is a commissioner and presenter; catalyst for new artists, audiences, and creative workforce; and partner in the projection of the african american narrative and its role in the development of american and global…

Arts & Culture
10
The Aaron Diamond Aids Research Center for the City of New York

Aids research (see also schedule o)

11
Performance Space 122 Inc

See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…

Arts & Culture
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Broadway Caresequity Fights Aids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smalls Live Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $130,969 · OtherBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INCTAIWAN LOVE AND HOPE ASSOCIATION — $32,117 · OtherTAIWAN LOVE AND HOPE ASSOCIATIONTHE LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER — $26,312 · OtherTHE LGBT COMMUNITY CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $23,760 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTAIWAN AIDS FOUNDATION — $22,406 · OtherTAIWAN AIDS FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF FIRE ISLAND PINES — $15,500 · OtherHARMONY HOME FOUNDATION TAIWAN — $14,000 · Other+29 more — $101,475 · Other+29 moreGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $106,552 · HealthGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISI…APICHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $5,000 · HealthJUILLIARD SCHOOL — $25,309 · EducationUBUNTU PATHWAYS INC — $1,000 · EducationJAPAN SOCIETY INC — $9,100 · Arts & CultureCOOL CULTURE INC — $2,840 · Arts & CultureSmalls Live Foundation Inc — $2,560 · Arts & CultureLIVING THE CREATIVE LIFE — $2,453 · Arts & CultureTHE HUDSON REVIEW INC — $2,422 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $470 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGON — $15,880 · EnvironmentLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $5,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 · Civil RightsALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $3,850 · Housing & Shelter
Other$366,539Health$111,552Education$26,309Arts & Culture$19,845Environment$15,880Civil Rights$6,000Housing & Shelter$3,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $130,969 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $106,552 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL — $25,309 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJAPAN SOCIETY INC — $9,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPICHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $3,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOL CULTURE INC — $2,840 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING THE CREATIVE LIFE — $2,453 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE HUDSON REVIEW INC — $2,422 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRIOT CIRCLE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUBUNTU PATHWAYS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $470 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
  • Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC
  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL
  • Who funds JAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGON
  • Who funds JAPAN SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC
  • Who funds APICHA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC
  • Who funds COOL CULTURE INC
  • Who funds Smalls Live Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LIVING THE CREATIVE LIFE
  • Who funds THE HUDSON REVIEW INC
  • Who funds GRIOT CIRCLE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Omomuki Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Omomuki Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Omomuki Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph